Clinical Neurosurgery

Spine Surgery

Spine Surgery

What Do You Need to Know?

  • ACDF is the workhorse for 1–2 level cervical disc herniation causing radiculopathy or myelopathy; posterior approaches (laminectomy/laminoplasty) are preferred for ≥3 levels
  • Cauda equina syndrome is a surgical emergency — bilateral leg pain/weakness, saddle anesthesia, urinary retention; decompression ideally within 24 hours
  • Cervical myelopathy: surgery indicated for moderate-severe disease (mJOA <15) or progressive deficits; approach dictated by number of levels and alignment
  • Fusion indications: instability, spondylolisthesis, deformity correction, post-tumor resection; avoid unnecessary fusion (risk of adjacent segment disease)
  • Metastatic cord compression: NOMS framework guides management; Patchell trial showed surgery + RT superior to RT alone for single-level compression
  • SPORT trial: surgery for lumbar disc herniation provides faster improvement but long-term outcomes converge with conservative treatment
🚩 Don’t Miss — Test-Day Priorities
  • Cauda equina syndrome: bilateral LE weakness + saddle anesthesia + urinary retention/incontinence + bowel dysfunction → EMERGENT MRI + decompression within 24–48h; central disc herniation at L4–L5 / L5–S1 most common culprit
  • Metastatic epidural cord compression: give dexamethasone 16 mg/day promptly (oral or equivalent IV) for suspected MSCC with neurologic symptoms/signs (NICE NG234); avoid steroids before tissue diagnosis when lymphoma is suspected unless urgent neurologic compromise requires treatment; urgent MRI whole spine + neurosurgery and rad-onc consult for decompression and/or radiation (Patchell — surgery + RT > RT alone)
  • Spinal epidural abscess: back pain + fever + neuro deficit in IV drug use / diabetes / recent procedure → urgent contrast MRI and antibiotics required; surgical drainage plus antibiotics is standard when there is neurologic deficit, progression, spinal instability, sepsis, or failure of medical therapy; carefully selected neurologically intact patients with an identified organism and close monitoring may be treated medically
  • Cervical myelopathy: progressive gait/balance loss + hand clumsiness + Hoffmann/Babinski + hyperreflexia + Lhermitte; T2 cord hyperintensity at compression level → surgical decompression (ACDF for 1–2 levels, laminoplasty/laminectomy + fusion for ≥3 levels)
  • Anterior spinal cord infarction: abdominal aortic dissection / cross-clamp / atherosclerosis → paraplegia + bilateral pain/temperature loss + sphincter dysfunction with PRESERVED proprioception/vibration (dorsal columns spared)
  • Lumbar stenosis: neurogenic claudication worse with standing/walking, better with FLEXION/sitting (shopping-cart sign); MRI confirms; conservative first, laminectomy ± fusion if recalcitrant
  • Chiari I: cerebellar tonsils >5 mm below foramen magnum + tussive (Valsalva-induced) occipital headache + neck pain + ataxia ± syrinx → suboccipital decompression (duraplasty vs not is controversial)
  • Syringomyelia: central cord cavity → suspended bilateral UE dissociated sensory loss (pain/temp lost, vibration/proprioception spared) + LMN weakness ± Charcot joints; address underlying Chiari / tethered cord / post-traumatic etiology
  • Spinal dural AVF: progressive myelopathy from venous hypertension → conus medullaris T2 hyperintensity + serpiginous dorsal flow voids; surgical clipping or endovascular embolization
  • Spondylolisthesis: degenerative (older, L4–L5) vs isthmic (young, pars defect at L5–S1) → FUSION if neurologic deficit + significant slip / instability
🔍 Buzzwords & Pathognomonic FindingsClinical · Imaging / decision · Surgical approach
Clinical clues
  • Saddle anesthesia + urinary retention + bilateral LE weaknessCauda equina syndrome
  • Hand clumsiness + gait imbalance + Hoffmann/Babinski + LhermitteCervical myelopathy
  • Shopping-cart sign / better with flexion-sitting, worse with standing-walkingNeurogenic claudication from lumbar stenosis
  • Tussive (Valsalva-induced) occipital headache + neck pain ± ataxiaChiari malformation type I
  • Suspended bilateral UE dissociated sensory loss + LMN weakness ± Charcot jointsSyringomyelia
  • Paraplegia + bilateral pain/temp loss with preserved proprioception/vibration after aortic surgeryAnterior spinal cord infarction
  • Back pain + fever + neuro deficit in IVDU/diabeticSpinal epidural abscess
  • Progressive lower-extremity myelopathy in older man, often misdiagnosed as stenosisSpinal dural AVF
Imaging / decision
  • Cerebellar tonsils >5 mm below foramen magnum on sagittal MRIChiari I (consider suboccipital decompression)
  • T2 cord hyperintensity at compression levelCervical myelopathy — surgical indication
  • Serpiginous dorsal flow voids + conus T2 hyperintensitySpinal dural AVF
  • Central canal expansion with fluid-filled cavity / cyst within cordIntramedullary tumor (ependymoma, astrocytoma) vs syrinx
  • Eccentric dural-based extramedullary massMeningioma / schwannoma (intradural extramedullary)
  • Vertebral body destruction / pedicle erosion with epidural soft tissueExtradural metastasis — STAT dexamethasone + MRI whole spine
  • Pars interarticularis defect on oblique X-ray (“Scotty dog collar”)Isthmic spondylolisthesis
  • Rim-enhancing dorsal epidural collection on MRI with contrastSpinal epidural abscess
Surgical approach / pearls
  • ACDF (Smith-Robinson)1–2 level anterior cervical disc/myelopathy — workhorse cervical operation
  • Laminoplasty≥3 level cervical stenosis with PRESERVED lordosis (fails in kyphosis — cord can’t drift back)
  • Laminectomy + posterior fusionMultilevel cervical stenosis with kyphosis or instability
  • TLIF vs PLIFTLIF (unilateral, less neural retraction) is the most popular lumbar fusion; PLIF for central pathology
  • ALIFBest access to L5–S1 (LLIF/XLIF blocked by iliac crest); watch for vascular injury and retrograde ejaculation
  • Suboccipital decompression ± duraplastyChiari I with symptoms or syrinx
  • Surgical clipping or endovascular embolizationSpinal dural AVF
  • Pedicle screws + rods (instrumentation)Fusion construct — watch for pseudarthrosis, hardware failure, adjacent segment disease, infection
Anterior vs. Posterior Approach

Decision Framework

  • Key principle: approach from the direction of the compressive pathology
  • Anterior compression (disc herniation, osteophyte, vertebral body pathology) → anterior approach
  • Posterior compression (ligamentum flavum hypertrophy, facet overgrowth, multilevel stenosis) → posterior approach
  • Circumferential compression: may require combined or staged approach
  • Other factors: number of levels, sagittal alignment (lordosis vs. kyphosis), prior surgery, medical comorbidities

Cervical Spine Approaches

ApproachProcedureIndicationsKey Points
AnteriorACDF (Anterior Cervical Discectomy & Fusion)1–2 level disc herniation, cervical radiculopathy/myelopathy from anterior compressionMost commonly performed cervical spine surgery; removes disc + fuses adjacent vertebrae with graft/plate; Smith-Robinson approach
AnteriorCervical corpectomyVertebral body pathology, retrovertebral disc, OPLL spanning disc space, tumorRemoves entire vertebral body + adjacent discs; higher pseudarthrosis rate than ACDF
AnteriorCervical disc replacement (arthroplasty)Single/two-level cervical disease in appropriate candidatePreserves motion; may reduce adjacent segment disease; contraindicated if facet arthropathy, instability, or ossification
PosteriorLaminectomy + fusion≥3 level cervical stenosis; any alignmentWide decompression; requires fusion with lateral mass or pedicle screws to prevent post-laminectomy kyphosis
PosteriorLaminoplasty≥3 level cervical stenosis; preserved lordosis requiredExpands canal without removing lamina (open-door or French-door technique); preserves motion; NOT for kyphotic spines

Lumbar Spine Approaches

ApproachProcedureKey Features
PosteriorPLIF (Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion)Bilateral approach through the spinal canal; higher retraction of neural elements; good for central pathology
PosteriorTLIF (Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion)Unilateral approach through the foramen; less neural retraction than PLIF; most popular lumbar fusion technique
LateralLLIF/XLIF (Lateral/Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion)Traverses psoas muscle; risk of lumbar plexus injury; cannot access L5–S1 (iliac crest blocks access); good for coronal deformity correction
AnteriorALIF (Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion)Retroperitoneal or transperitoneal approach; best access to L5–S1; risk of vascular injury (iliac vessels), retrograde ejaculation in males

ACDF Complications

  • Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury: hoarseness; historically taught to be more common with right-sided approach due to RLN course variability, but current evidence shows no significant difference between sides. Surgeon preference and prior neck surgery typically dictate side. Transient in most cases.
  • Dysphagia: most common complication — early postoperative dysphagia up to 50% (most resolves over weeks to months); persistent dysphagia at 1 year ~5–15%
  • Esophageal perforation: rare but serious
  • Vertebral artery injury: rare; risk with far-lateral dissection
  • Adjacent segment disease: long-term degeneration above/below the fusion
💎 Board Pearl
  • ACDF is the most commonly performed cervical spine surgery and the first-line surgical option for 1–2 level anterior cervical pathology
  • Laminoplasty requires preserved cervical lordosis — it will not work in kyphotic spines because the cord cannot drift posteriorly away from anterior compression
  • LLIF/XLIF cannot access L5–S1 due to the iliac crest; ALIF is preferred for this level
  • Recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy was historically taught to be more common with right-sided ACDF due to RLN course variability, but current evidence shows no significant difference between sides — side selection is now driven by surgeon preference and prior neck surgery
Fusion vs. Non-Fusion

When to Fuse

Indication for FusionRationaleExample
InstabilityAbnormal motion compromises neural elementsSpondylolisthesis, post-traumatic instability, rheumatoid atlantoaxial subluxation
Deformity correctionMaintain corrected alignmentKyphosis correction, scoliosis surgery
Post-tumor resectionLoss of structural support after vertebral body resectionCorpectomy for metastatic disease
Multilevel decompressionRisk of post-laminectomy kyphosisCervical laminectomy ≥3 levels → add lateral mass/pedicle screw fixation
Recurrent disc herniationFailed prior decompression aloneRepeat surgery at same level

When NOT to Fuse

  • Simple lumbar disc herniation: discectomy/microdiscectomy alone is sufficient
  • Single-level lumbar laminectomy: no evidence of benefit from adding fusion if spine is stable
  • No instability on flexion/extension imaging
  • Laminoplasty: inherently motion-preserving; does not require fusion

Instrumentation

  • Pedicle screws: strongest posterior fixation point; placed through vertebral pedicle into body; used with rods for posterior stabilization
  • Lateral mass screws: used in subaxial cervical spine (C3–C7) where pedicles are too small for pedicle screws; C7 lateral mass is thinner than C3–C6, so pedicle screws are sometimes preferred at C7 for stronger fixation
  • Interbody cages: structural spacer placed in disc space; filled with bone graft; restores disc height and provides anterior column support
  • Bone graft options: autograft (iliac crest — gold standard), allograft, BMP-2 (bone morphogenetic protein); BMP-2 has complications including heterotopic ossification and swelling

Adjacent Segment Disease (ASD)

  • Accelerated degeneration of levels adjacent to a fusion due to increased biomechanical stress
  • Radiographic changes in up to 25–30% at 10 years; symptomatic ASD in ~10%
  • More common with longer fusion constructs and multilevel fusions
  • Motion preservation (disc arthroplasty, laminoplasty) may reduce ASD risk — theoretical benefit, long-term data still accumulating
💎 Board Pearl
  • Adjacent segment disease is the major long-term consequence of spinal fusion — levels above and below the fusion bear increased mechanical stress
  • Cervical laminectomy without fusion in ≥3 levels risks post-laminectomy kyphosis — always consider adding posterior fixation
  • Fusion is NOT needed for a simple, first-time lumbar microdiscectomy with a stable spine
Cauda Equina Syndrome — Emergency Decompression

Clinical Presentation

  • Classic triad: bilateral lower extremity weakness/pain, saddle anesthesia (S2–S5), bladder dysfunction
  • Red flags requiring urgent imaging:
    • Bilateral sciatica (especially new onset)
    • Saddle anesthesia or perineal numbness
    • Urinary retention (most consistent finding) with overflow incontinence
    • Decreased rectal tone / fecal incontinence
    • Progressive bilateral leg weakness
    • Sexual dysfunction (new onset)
  • Most common cause: large central lumbar disc herniation (most often L4–L5 or L5–S1)
  • Other causes: spinal epidural abscess, epidural hematoma, tumor, spinal stenosis, post-surgical

Incomplete vs. Complete CES

TypeDefinitionPrognosis
CES-Incomplete (CES-I)Urinary difficulties (urgency, poor stream, straining) but ability to void presentBetter outcomes; higher chance of bladder recovery if decompressed early
CES-Retention (CES-R)Painless urinary retention with overflow incontinence; atonic bladderWorse prognosis; lower rate of full bladder recovery even with prompt surgery

Diagnosis

  • MRI is the study of choice — demonstrates level and cause of compression
  • CT myelogram if MRI contraindicated
  • Post-void residual >200 mL supports diagnosis in equivocal cases
  • Do NOT delay imaging for urodynamics or EMG

Surgical Timing

  • Surgical emergency: decompression ideally within 24 hours of symptom onset
  • Earlier surgery (<24 hours) associated with better neurological and bladder outcomes in most studies
  • Surgery within 24–48 hours is still beneficial; outcomes decline significantly after 48 hours
  • CES-I → CES-R conversion can occur rapidly — argue for earliest possible decompression to prevent progression
  • Standard procedure: wide laminectomy with discectomy at the affected level
Clinical Pearl
  • Urinary retention is the most reliable sign of cauda equina syndrome — always check a post-void residual in patients with acute back pain and bilateral leg symptoms
  • A patient with back pain, bilateral sciatica, and new urinary symptoms needs an emergent MRI — do not wait for outpatient workup
💎 Board Pearl
  • Cauda equina syndrome = surgical emergency; decompression within 24 hours is the goal; CES-Incomplete has better prognosis than CES-Retention
  • Most common cause: large central lumbar disc herniation at L4–L5 or L5–S1
  • MRI is the study of choice — never delay imaging in suspected CES
  • Bladder function recovery correlates most strongly with preoperative bladder status (incomplete > retention) and timing of surgery
Cervical Myelopathy

Definition & Pathophysiology

  • Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM): most common cause of spinal cord dysfunction in adults >55 years
  • Chronic compression of the cervical spinal cord from degenerative changes: disc herniation, osteophyte formation, ligamentum flavum hypertrophy, OPLL
  • Cord compression → demyelination → axonal loss → gliosis; often irreversible once established
  • Cord signal change on T2 MRI indicates myelomalacia/gliosis; T1 hypointensity = worse prognosis

Clinical Features

  • Gait dysfunction (broad-based, spastic); often the earliest motor finding
  • Hand clumsiness / loss of fine motor dexterity (myelopathy hand — grip-and-release test; finger escape sign)
  • Upper motor neuron signs: hyperreflexia, Hoffman sign, clonus, Babinski, spastic tone
  • Lhermitte sign (electric shock sensation with neck flexion)
  • Sensory changes: numbness, paresthesias in hands; posterior column dysfunction
  • Bowel/bladder dysfunction: late finding indicating severe myelopathy

Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) Score

SeveritymJOA ScoreManagement
Mild≥15 (out of 18)Non-operative monitoring with serial exams + MRI; surgery if progression
Moderate12–14Surgical decompression recommended
Severe<12Surgical decompression strongly recommended; outcomes worse than moderate but still beneficial

Surgical Approach Selection

ScenarioPreferred ApproachRationale
1–2 level anterior compressionACDFDirectly addresses anterior pathology; high fusion rate
≥3 levels, preserved lordosisLaminoplastyMotion-preserving; canal expansion; lower ASD risk
≥3 levels, kyphotic or neutralLaminectomy + posterior fusionLaminoplasty contraindicated in kyphosis; fusion prevents progression
≥3 levels with significant anterior compressionCombined anterior-posterior or stagedAnterior corpectomy + posterior stabilization for circumferential disease
OPLL (ossification of PLL)Posterior if ≥60% canal occupation or K-line negative; anterior if focal/low canal occupation (<50–60%) and K-line positiveAnterior approach risks CSF leak with OPLL adherent to dura; K-line (line from C2 to C7 spinal canal midpoints) negative = OPLL crosses the line → posterior decompression alone may be insufficient

Key Considerations

  • Natural history: CSM is generally progressive; stepwise deterioration is the most common pattern; rarely improves spontaneously
  • Earlier surgery = better outcomes: patients with shorter symptom duration and less cord damage have better surgical results
  • Collar immobilization does not treat myelopathy; used only for temporary stabilization in trauma or post-operatively
💎 Board Pearl
  • mJOA <15 = surgery; mJOA ≥15 = reasonable to observe if stable, but counsel that CSM rarely improves spontaneously
  • T2 hyperintensity in the cord = myelomalacia/gliosis; additional T1 hypointensity = worse prognosis and more advanced disease
  • Hoffman sign (thumb/index finger flexion with flicking middle finger DIP) is one of the most sensitive clinical signs of cervical myelopathy
  • OPLL is more common in East Asian populations; posterior approach preferred if ≥60% canal occupation or K-line negative; anterior approach reserved for focal/low canal occupation (<50–60%) and K-line positive disease (anterior carries higher dural tear/CSF leak risk when OPLL is adherent)
Spinal Cord Compression — Metastatic Disease

Epidemiology & Presentation

  • Metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) occurs in 5–10% of cancer patients
  • Most common primary tumors: lung, breast, prostate, renal cell, multiple myeloma
  • Thoracic spine is the most common location (~60%), followed by lumbar and cervical
  • Back pain is the earliest and most common symptom (>90%); precedes neurologic deficits by weeks to months
  • Progressive weakness, sensory level, bowel/bladder dysfunction indicate cord compression

NOMS Decision Framework

ComponentAssessmentImplications
N — NeurologicBilsky ESCC (Epidural Spinal Cord Compression) grade (0–3) plus presence/absence of myelopathy or functional radiculopathyBilsky 0 = bone only; 1 = epidural impingement without cord deformity (1a/1b/1c); 2 = cord deformation with CSF visible; 3 = cord deformation with no CSF visible. High-grade ESCC (2–3) with myelopathy → urgent surgical decompression / separation surgery
O — OncologicTumor histology and radiosensitivityRadiosensitive (lymphoma, myeloma, seminoma, small cell) → radiation; radioresistant (RCC, melanoma, sarcoma) → surgery + stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)
M — Mechanical stabilitySINS score (Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score)SINS 0–6 = stable; 7–12 = potentially unstable (surgical consult); 13–18 = unstable (stabilization needed)
S — Systemic diseaseOverall prognosis, comorbidities, life expectancyExpected survival <3 months or poor functional status → favor non-operative management; good prognosis → more aggressive surgery

SINS (Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score)

ParameterOptions & Points
LocationJunctional (C0–C2, C7–T2, T11–L1 only) = 3; mobile spine (C3–C6, L2–L4) = 2; semi-rigid (T3–T10) = 1; rigid (S2–S5) = 0
PainMechanical = 3; occasional/non-mechanical = 1; pain-free = 0
Bone lesion typeLytic = 2; mixed = 1; blastic = 0
AlignmentSubluxation/translation = 4; de novo deformity (kyphosis/scoliosis) = 2; normal = 0
Vertebral body collapse>50% = 3; <50% = 2; none but >50% involved = 1; none = 0
Posterolateral involvementBilateral = 3; unilateral = 1; none = 0
  • SINS 0–6: stable — no surgical stabilization needed
  • SINS 7–12: potentially unstable — surgical consultation
  • SINS 13–18: unstable — surgical stabilization indicated

The Patchell Trial (2005)

  • Design: RCT comparing direct decompressive surgery + postoperative RT vs. RT alone for single-level MESCC
  • Key finding: surgery + RT group had significantly more patients who regained/retained ability to walk (84% vs. 57%)
  • Surgery group also had: longer ambulatory duration, longer survival, reduced need for opioids and corticosteroids
  • Inclusion: single area of cord compression, at least one neurologic sign
  • Exclusion: radiosensitive tumors (lymphoma, myeloma, leukemia, germ cell), multiple areas of cord compression; excluded patients who had been completely paraplegic for >48 hours prior to enrollment (these patients were not expected to recover function)
  • Conclusion: surgery + RT is standard of care for single-level MESCC from radioresistant tumors in surgical candidates

Management Summary

ScenarioManagement
Acute/progressive neurologic deficitUrgent surgical decompression ± stabilization + dexamethasone
Radioresistant tumor + mechanical instabilitySurgery + SRS or conventional RT
Radiosensitive tumor (lymphoma, myeloma)Radiation ± chemotherapy; surgery if mechanically unstable
Poor surgical candidate / poor prognosisRadiation + steroids + supportive care
No neurologic deficit + stable spineConventional RT or SRS; monitor closely

Steroids in Metastatic Cord Compression

  • Dexamethasone started immediately upon diagnosis — higher-dose regimens (96 mg load) have been used historically; current practice favors moderate dosing (10–16 mg load, 16 mg/day) due to side-effect profile
  • Reduces vasogenic edema, provides temporary neurologic improvement
  • Bridge to definitive treatment (surgery or radiation)
Clinical Pearl
  • New back pain in a cancer patient is metastatic disease until proven otherwise — do not dismiss as musculoskeletal without appropriate imaging
  • Start dexamethasone immediately once cord compression is confirmed — do not wait for surgical or radiation planning
💎 Board Pearl
  • Patchell trial: surgery + RT > RT alone for single-level metastatic cord compression (radioresistant tumors); surgery group retained ambulation (84% vs. 57%)
  • SINS ≥7 = potentially unstable → surgical consultation; SINS ≥13 = unstable → stabilization indicated
  • Radiosensitive tumors (lymphoma, myeloma, seminoma) can be treated with radiation alone unless mechanically unstable
  • Thoracic spine is the most common location for spinal metastases (~60%)
Lumbar Spine Conditions

Lumbar Disc Herniation

  • Natural history: most improve with conservative treatment over 6–12 weeks; disc resorption occurs in up to 60–70% over time
  • Surgical indications:
    • Refractory radiculopathy after ≥6 weeks of conservative management
    • Progressive motor deficit (e.g., foot drop)
    • Cauda equina syndrome (emergency)
    • Intractable pain significantly impairing function
  • SPORT trial (Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial):
    • Surgery provides faster pain relief and functional improvement at 3 months and 1 year
    • By 4–8 years, outcomes tend to converge between surgical and non-operative groups (intent-to-treat analysis)
    • High crossover rate (~40% non-operative crossed to surgery) complicated interpretation
    • As-treated analysis favored surgery at all time points

Surgical Techniques for Disc Herniation

TechniqueDescriptionKey Points
MicrodiscectomySmall incision, microscope-assisted removal of herniated fragmentGold standard surgical treatment; 85–90% success rate for radiculopathy; low complication rate
Standard discectomyOpen approach with removal of herniated materialLargely replaced by microdiscectomy in modern practice
Endoscopic discectomyMinimally invasive, endoscope-guided removalShorter recovery; smaller incision; growing adoption; steep learning curve
  • Recurrence rate: 5–15% after microdiscectomy; recurrent herniation at same level may eventually require fusion

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

  • Neurogenic claudication: bilateral leg pain/heaviness/numbness worsened by walking and standing, relieved by sitting or leaning forward (flexion opens the canal)
  • Differentiate from vascular claudication: neurogenic relieved by sitting/flexion; vascular relieved by standing still (no need to sit)
  • Conservative treatment: PT, epidural steroid injections, activity modification; reasonable for mild-moderate symptoms
  • Surgical indication: neurogenic claudication refractory to ≥3 months conservative treatment with significant functional limitation
  • SPORT trial for stenosis: surgery (decompressive laminectomy) associated with greater improvement in pain and function compared to non-operative care at all time points up to 8 years
  • Procedure: lumbar laminectomy (decompression) at affected levels; fusion added only if concurrent instability or spondylolisthesis

Spondylolisthesis

  • Definition: anterior slippage of one vertebral body on another
  • Wiltse classification (full list):
    • Type I — Dysplastic: congenital abnormality of the L5–S1 facets/pars; risk of high-grade slip
    • Type II — Isthmic: pars interarticularis defect (spondylolysis); most common at L5–S1; typical in young athletes (gymnasts, football linemen)
    • Type III — Degenerative: facet joint arthropathy; most common at L4–L5; more common in women >50
    • Type IV — Traumatic: acute fracture of a posterior element (other than pars) producing slip
    • Type V — Pathologic: tumor, infection, or metabolic bone disease weakening the posterior elements
    • Type VI — Iatrogenic: post-surgical (e.g., after wide decompression or facetectomy)
  • Meyerding classification: Grade I (<25% slip), Grade II (25–50%), Grade III (50–75%), Grade IV (75–100%), Grade V (spondyloptosis = complete slip)

Surgical Management by Grade

GradeManagement
Grade I–II (low grade)Conservative treatment first; surgery (decompression + fusion) if symptomatic with refractory radiculopathy/claudication or progressive slip
Grade III–IV (high grade)Surgical management recommended — decompression + instrumented fusion with possible reduction
Grade V (spondyloptosis)Always surgical; reduction + fusion; high complication rate including L5 nerve root stretch injury
💎 Board Pearl
  • SPORT trial: for lumbar disc herniation, surgery provides faster recovery but long-term outcomes converge; for lumbar stenosis, surgery was superior at all time points
  • Neurogenic vs. vascular claudication: neurogenic = relieved by sitting/flexion (shopping cart sign); vascular = relieved by simply standing still
  • Isthmic spondylolisthesis = pars defect; most common at L5–S1; degenerative spondylolisthesis = facet arthropathy; most common at L4–L5
  • High-grade spondylolisthesis (Grade III–V) is essentially always a surgical indication
  • Microdiscectomy is the gold standard surgical treatment for lumbar disc herniation — 85–90% success rate for radiculopathy
Surgical Urgency Classification

Spine Surgery Urgency

UrgencyTimeframeConditions
Emergent (<24 hours)Immediate / within hoursCauda equina syndrome; acute spinal cord compression with progressive deficit; epidural abscess with neurologic compromise; unstable spine fracture with cord compression
Urgent (24–72 hours)Within 1–3 daysMetastatic cord compression with new deficit (Patchell criteria); progressive myelopathy; acute disc herniation with motor deficit (e.g., foot drop)
Semi-urgent (1–4 weeks)Prompt schedulingProgressive cervical myelopathy (moderate-severe mJOA); worsening spondylolisthesis with neurologic symptoms
ElectiveWeeks to monthsRefractory radiculopathy after conservative failure; neurogenic claudication failing conservative management; stable spondylolisthesis with chronic symptoms
💎 Board Pearl
  • Three absolute surgical emergencies in spine: cauda equina syndrome, acute cord compression with progressive deficit, and spinal epidural abscess with neurologic deficit, progression, instability, sepsis, or failure of medical therapy; carefully selected neurologically intact patients with identified organism may be treated medically with close monitoring
  • Timing matters most in cauda equina syndrome — decompress within 24 hours; CES-Incomplete has a narrow window before converting to CES-Retention
  • For metastatic cord compression, start dexamethasone 16 mg/day (oral or equivalent IV) promptly (NICE NG234) and arrange urgent surgical evaluation; if lymphoma is suspected, avoid steroids before tissue diagnosis unless urgent neurologic compromise mandates treatment
Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury & ASIA Classification

Initial Management

  • ATLS principles: airway (with in-line cervical stabilization), breathing, circulation; cervical collar + full spine precautions until cleared
  • Assess level and completeness of injury; document baseline ASIA exam early and serially
  • Avoid hypotension (MAP goal often 85–90 mmHg × 5–7 days in many protocols) to preserve cord perfusion

ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS)

GradeDefinition
A — CompleteNo motor or sensory function preserved in the sacral segments S4–S5
B — Sensory incompleteSensory but not motor function preserved below the neurological level, including sacral segments S4–S5
C — Motor incompleteMotor function preserved below the neurological level; more than half of key muscles below have a muscle grade <3
D — Motor incompleteMotor function preserved below the neurological level; more than half of key muscles below have a muscle grade ≥3
E — NormalMotor and sensory function normal; used for patients with prior deficits who recover fully

Steroids in Acute Traumatic SCI

  • Methylprednisolone is NOT recommended in acute traumatic SCI per AANS/CNS 2013 guidelines
  • NASCIS I–III trials initially suggested benefit, but post-hoc subgroup analyses were methodologically flawed; subsequent reviews found no clear benefit and a harm signal (infection, GI bleeding, hyperglycemia, pneumonia)
  • NASCIS controversy is considered resolved against routine steroid use

Timing of Decompression

  • STASCIS trial (Fehlings 2012): prospective cohort of acute cervical SCI — decompression within 24 hours associated with significantly improved neurologic outcomes (≥2-grade AIS improvement at 6 months) compared to delayed surgery
  • Earlier decompression is generally favored when patient is stable enough for surgery
💎 Board Pearl
  • ASIA A = complete; sacral sparing (S4–S5) is the dividing line between complete and incomplete injury
  • Methylprednisolone is NOT recommended in acute SCI (AANS/CNS 2013); NASCIS data does not support it and shows harm
  • STASCIS: decompression within 24 hours improves outcomes in acute cervical SCI
High-Yield Spine Fractures & Craniovertebral-Junction Patterns
FractureMechanism / LocationStability & Management
Jefferson fracture (C1 burst)Axial load (diving, falling object); bilateral fracture of anterior & posterior C1 archesUnstable if transverse atlantal ligament torn (rule of Spence: combined C1 lateral mass displacement >7 mm on open-mouth view). Halo or fusion if unstable
Odontoid Type ITip of dens (alar ligament avulsion)Usually stable; collar
Odontoid Type IIBase of dens — most common odontoid fractureUnstable; high non-union rate (especially >65 y); often surgical (anterior odontoid screw or posterior C1-C2 fusion)
Odontoid Type IIIExtends into C2 bodyBest healing prognosis; halo or rigid collar usually sufficient
Hangman fracture (traumatic spondylolisthesis of C2)Hyperextension/distraction (judicial hanging, MVC dashboard); bilateral C2 pars/pedicle fracture ± anterior C2-on-C3 displacementLevine-Edwards grade I usually halo; higher grades need surgical fusion
Chance fractureFlexion-distraction at thoracolumbar junction through the body, pedicles & spinous process (“seat-belt sign”)Unstable; assume concomitant intra-abdominal injury (~50%); surgical fixation
Burst fracture (T/L)Axial compression with retropulsion of body fragmentsSurgical if >50% canal compromise, >25° kyphosis, or neurologic deficit (TLICS ≥5)

Atlantoaxial Instability — High-Risk Populations

  • Down syndrome: ligamentous laxity at C1–C2; screen with flexion/extension lateral C-spine films before contact sports or elective intubation. Symptomatic instability requires surgical fusion.
  • Rheumatoid arthritis: chronic synovitis erodes the transverse ligament → C1–C2 subluxation, retro-odontoid inflammatory pannus (T1 iso, T2 bright, enhances), basilar invagination with cervicomedullary compression. Pre-operative cervical MRI mandatory before general anesthesia in long-standing RA.
  • Klippel-Feil, Morquio syndrome (MPS IV), os odontoideum, achondroplasia — other congenital causes of upper cervical instability.
💎 Board Pearl
  • Odontoid II = most common, most unstable. Type III heals best.
  • Chance fracture = lap-belt MVC + abdominal injury (mesenteric/duodenal); always image the abdomen.
  • Down syndrome + neck pain or new myelopathic signs = C1–C2 instability until proven otherwise.
  • RA + sudden quadriparesis or death → basilar invagination with pannus compressing the medulla.
Neurogenic Shock vs. Spinal Shock
Neurogenic ShockSpinal Shock
What it isHemodynamic disturbance — hypotension + bradycardia from disruption of descending sympathetic pathwaysTransient loss of all reflexes/tone/function below the level of injury
Typical injury levelCervical or upper thoracic SCI (above T6)Any level of SCI
Clinical featuresHypotension, bradycardia (unopposed vagal tone), warm/dry skin (peripheral vasodilation)Flaccid paralysis, areflexia, anesthesia, hypotonia, loss of bulbocavernosus reflex
DurationDays to weeksDays to weeks; resolution heralded by return of bulbocavernosus reflex (usually first reflex to return)
TreatmentIV fluids first; vasopressors (norepinephrine or phenylephrine) if persistent; atropine for symptomatic bradycardia; maintain MAP 85–90 mmHgSupportive; treat the underlying SCI; no specific pharmacotherapy
Clinical Pearl
  • Spinal shock ends when the bulbocavernosus reflex returns — only then can a true ASIA exam classify complete vs. incomplete
  • Neurogenic shock is hemodynamic (BP/HR); spinal shock is neurologic (reflexes/tone)
Incomplete Spinal Cord Syndromes
SyndromeMechanism / AnatomyClinical Features
Central cord syndromeMost common incomplete SCI; hyperextension injury in elderly with pre-existing cervical stenosis; central gray + medial corticospinal tract (hands)Upper extremity weakness > lower extremity (“hands > legs”); variable sensory loss; sacral sparing; bladder dysfunction common
Anterior cord syndromeAnterior spinal artery territory; flexion injury, vascular insult, or anterior compression; affects anterior 2/3 of cordBilateral motor loss (corticospinal) + loss of pain/temperature (spinothalamic) below level; dorsal columns (vibration/proprioception) spared; worst prognosis for recovery
Brown-Séquard syndromeHemicord injury — classically penetrating trauma; also tumor, MS plaqueIpsilateral motor (corticospinal) and dorsal column (vibration/proprioception) loss below level; contralateral pain/temperature loss starting 1–2 levels below; best prognosis of incomplete syndromes
Posterior cord syndromeRare; posterior spinal artery infarct, B12 deficiency, tabes dorsalis, MSLoss of vibration/proprioception (dorsal columns); preserved motor, pain, temperature; gait ataxia (sensory)
💎 Board Pearl
  • Central cord syndrome: elderly + hyperextension + hands > legs = classic stem; most common incomplete SCI; sacral sparing present
  • Anterior cord syndrome: motor + spinothalamic out, dorsal columns intact; worst prognosis
  • Brown-Séquard: ipsilateral motor/dorsal column + contralateral pain/temp; best prognosis
Conus Medullaris vs. Cauda Equina Syndromes
Conus Medullaris SyndromeCauda Equina Syndrome
AnatomyS1–S5 + coccygeal segments of the spinal cord itself (ends ~L1–L2 in adults)Lumbosacral nerve roots below the conus
OnsetSudden, often bilateralGradual, often unilateral initially
PainLess prominent; bilateral if presentSevere radicular pain; often unilateral and asymmetric
Motor deficitSymmetric; less prominent than CESAsymmetric; motor-predominant; can be severe
SensorySymmetric saddle anesthesia (perianal)Asymmetric saddle anesthesia possible
Bowel/bladderEarly bowel/bladder dysfunction (sacral cord)May be spared early; develops as roots are progressively involved
ReflexesMixed UMN/LMN signs possible (cord involvement)Pure LMN; areflexia in affected roots
💎 Board Pearl
  • Conus = sudden, symmetric, early bowel/bladder, less pain; cauda = gradual, asymmetric, severe radicular pain, bowel/bladder later
  • Both are surgical emergencies when caused by reversible compression
Cervical Spine Clearance — NEXUS & Canadian C-Spine Rule

NEXUS Criteria

  • The cervical spine can be clinically cleared without imaging if ALL of the following are present:
    1. No posterior midline cervical tenderness
    2. No focal neurologic deficit
    3. Normal level of alertness
    4. No evidence of intoxication
    5. No painful distracting injury
  • High sensitivity for clinically significant cervical injury

Canadian C-Spine Rule

  • Step 1 — High-risk factors requiring imaging: age ≥65, dangerous mechanism (e.g., fall from >3 ft / 5 stairs, axial load, high-speed MVC, motorized recreational vehicle, bicycle collision), or paresthesias in extremities
  • Step 2 — Low-risk factors that allow safe assessment of range of motion: simple rear-end MVC, sitting in ED, ambulatory at any time, delayed onset of neck pain, no midline cervical tenderness
  • Step 3 — Active rotation: if able to actively rotate the neck 45° bilaterally, no imaging required
  • More specific than NEXUS in many studies; reduces imaging utilization in low-risk patients
💎 Board Pearl
  • NEXUS: 5 criteria, all must be negative to clinically clear without imaging
  • Canadian C-Spine Rule: any high-risk factor → image; otherwise check low-risk + ability to rotate 45°
Spinal Cord Tumors

Anatomic Classification

  • Extradural: majority are metastatic (covered in MESCC section)
  • Intradural-extramedullary (IDEM)
  • Intramedullary (IM)

Intradural-Extramedullary (IDEM) Tumors

TumorFeatures
MeningiomaMost common IDEM tumor in adults; female predominance; thoracic spine most common location; dural-based; usually benign (WHO grade 1); gross total resection curative in most cases
SchwannomaArises from Schwann cells of nerve root (typically sensory); “dumbbell” tumor through neural foramen; associated with NF2 (bilateral vestibular schwannomas + spinal schwannomas)
NeurofibromaAssociated with NF1; intermixed with nerve fibers (harder to resect without sacrificing root); plexiform variant can be locally aggressive

Intramedullary (IM) Tumors

TumorFeatures
EpendymomaMost common adult IM tumor; central within cord; well-circumscribed with a resectable cleavage plane; myxopapillary variant classically at conus/filum terminale; gross total resection has excellent outcome
AstrocytomaMost common pediatric IM tumor; infiltrative without clear cleavage plane; resection more limited; may need biopsy + radiation/chemo for higher grades
HemangioblastomaHighly vascular; associated with von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease (also retinal hemangioblastoma, RCC, pheochromocytoma, cerebellar hemangioblastoma); preoperative embolization sometimes used
💎 Board Pearl
  • Most common IDEM in adults = meningioma (thoracic, female)
  • Most common adult IM = ependymoma (resectable cleavage plane); most common pediatric IM = astrocytoma (infiltrative)
  • NF2 = bilateral vestibular schwannomas + spinal schwannomas; NF1 = neurofibromas; VHL = hemangioblastoma
  • Myxopapillary ependymoma is the classic conus/filum tumor
Spinal Vascular Malformations

Spinal Dural Arteriovenous Fistula (sDAVF)

  • Most common spinal vascular malformation; abnormal connection between a radicular artery and a radicular vein within the dural sleeve of a nerve root
  • Demographics: elderly men predominantly
  • Location: low thoracic / thoracolumbar most common
  • Clinical: progressive myelopathy (gait dysfunction, weakness, bowel/bladder), often misdiagnosed initially; Foix-Alajouanine syndrome = subacute necrotizing myelopathy from chronic venous congestion
  • MRI: central T2 cord hyperintensity (cord edema from venous hypertension) + serpentine flow voids on cord surface
  • Diagnosis: spinal angiography to identify the fistula site
  • Treatment: endovascular embolization or surgical clipping of the fistula; both can be definitive

Spinal AVM (Intramedullary)

  • True nidus within the cord parenchyma; congenital lesion; typically presents in younger patients
  • Can present with hemorrhage (subarachnoid or intramedullary) or progressive myelopathy
  • Treatment is multimodal: embolization, microsurgery, and/or radiosurgery depending on anatomy
💎 Board Pearl
  • sDAVF = elderly man + progressive myelopathy + low thoracic cord edema + flow voids on MRI; treat with embolization or surgical clipping
  • Foix-Alajouanine syndrome is the subacute necrotizing myelopathy from a chronic sDAVF
Syringomyelia
  • Definition: fluid-filled cavity (syrinx) within the spinal cord
  • Causes:
    • Chiari I malformation (most common cause overall) — tonsillar descent obstructs CSF flow at the foramen magnum
    • Post-traumatic (often years after SCI)
    • Post-infectious (arachnoiditis)
    • Tumor-associated (intramedullary tumor with cyst)
    • Idiopathic
  • Clinical: classic “cape” (suspended) distribution of pain/temperature loss over shoulders/upper arms with preservation of light touch (dissociated sensory loss); motor preservation early; later wasting of intrinsic hand muscles, scoliosis (especially in children)
  • Diagnosis: MRI demonstrates the syrinx and the underlying cause
  • Treatment: address the underlying cause — suboccipital decompression for Chiari-associated syrinx; syringo-subarachnoid or syringo-pleural shunt if syrinx persists or in selected refractory cases
💎 Board Pearl
  • Syrinx + cape distribution dissociated sensory loss = think Chiari I
  • Treat the cause first (e.g., Chiari decompression); shunting reserved for persistent/refractory cases
Tethered Cord Syndrome & Spina Bifida
  • Tethered cord syndrome: abnormal caudal fixation of the spinal cord, producing traction-related neurologic dysfunction
  • Anatomic causes:
    • Tight/thickened filum terminale
    • Conus below the L2 level in adults (normally ends ~L1–L2)
    • Intradural lipoma (lipomyelomeningocele)
    • Dermal sinus tract
    • Diastematomyelia (split cord)
    • Post-surgical scarring (re-tethering after myelomeningocele repair)
  • Spina bifida spectrum:
    • Spina bifida occulta: bony defect only; often incidental; cutaneous markers (hair tuft, dimple, hemangioma) over the spine raise concern
    • Meningocele: herniation of meninges without neural tissue
    • Myelomeningocele: herniation of meninges + neural tissue; associated with Chiari II; closed within first 24–72 hours after birth (or prenatally per MOMS trial in selected cases)
  • Clinical: progressive lower extremity weakness/sensory loss, bowel/bladder dysfunction, back/leg pain, foot deformity, scoliosis
  • Treatment: surgical detethering — release of the filum and/or untethering of adherent structures
💎 Board Pearl
  • Conus below L2 in an adult = tethered cord until proven otherwise
  • Cutaneous midline lumbosacral stigmata (hair tuft, dimple, hemangioma, lipoma) warrant MRI to rule out occult dysraphism
Vertebral Compression Fractures — Vertebroplasty & Kyphoplasty

Background

  • Most common in osteoporotic patients (postmenopausal women, chronic steroid use); also pathologic (metastasis, myeloma) and traumatic
  • Acute fracture → midline back pain, often mechanical; can produce kyphotic deformity if multiple/severe
  • Initial management: analgesia, bracing, treat underlying osteoporosis (bisphosphonates, denosumab, teriparatide); most heal conservatively over 6–8 weeks

Vertebral Augmentation Procedures

ProcedureDescriptionNotes
VertebroplastyPercutaneous injection of PMMA cement directly into the fractured vertebral bodyNo height restoration; higher risk of cement extravasation
KyphoplastyBalloon tamp inflated within vertebral body to create a cavity, then PMMA cement injected at lower pressureSome height restoration; lower extravasation risk than vertebroplasty

Evidence & Considerations

  • Pain-relief evidence is mixed: early sham-controlled RCTs (Kallmes/Buchbinder 2009 NEJM) showed no benefit over sham; later trials (VAPOUR, VERTOS IV) suggest benefit in select patients with acute fractures and severe pain
  • Most appropriate in patients with severe, refractory pain at a recent (<6–8 weeks) fracture and clear correlation between fracture level and symptoms
  • Complications: cement extravasation (epidural, paravertebral, venous — pulmonary cement embolism), adjacent-level fractures (cement-stiffened segment increases load on adjacent vertebrae), infection, neurologic injury
💎 Board Pearl
  • Kyphoplasty uses a balloon to create a cavity and partially restores height; vertebroplasty directly injects cement without height restoration
  • Pain-relief evidence is modest; reserve augmentation for refractory pain from acute osteoporotic fractures after conservative trial
  • Main complications: cement extravasation and adjacent-level fractures
🔒

Continue reading — sign in

The full note has more clinical pearls, tables, and board-focused tips. Free account, no fee.