Clinical Neurosurgery

Spine Surgery

Spine Surgery

What Do You Need to Know?

  • ACDF is the workhorse for 1–2 level cervical disc herniation causing radiculopathy or myelopathy; posterior approaches (laminectomy/laminoplasty) are preferred for ≥3 levels
  • Cauda equina syndrome is a surgical emergency — bilateral leg pain/weakness, saddle anesthesia, urinary retention; decompression ideally within 24 hours
  • Cervical myelopathy: surgery indicated for moderate-severe disease (mJOA <15) or progressive deficits; approach dictated by number of levels and alignment
  • Fusion indications: instability, spondylolisthesis, deformity correction, post-tumor resection; avoid unnecessary fusion (risk of adjacent segment disease)
  • Metastatic cord compression: NOMS framework guides management; Patchell trial showed surgery + RT superior to RT alone for single-level compression
  • SPORT trial: surgery for lumbar disc herniation provides faster improvement but long-term outcomes converge with conservative treatment
Anterior vs. Posterior Approach

Decision Framework

  • Key principle: approach from the direction of the compressive pathology
  • Anterior compression (disc herniation, osteophyte, vertebral body pathology) → anterior approach
  • Posterior compression (ligamentum flavum hypertrophy, facet overgrowth, multilevel stenosis) → posterior approach
  • Circumferential compression: may require combined or staged approach
  • Other factors: number of levels, sagittal alignment (lordosis vs. kyphosis), prior surgery, medical comorbidities

Cervical Spine Approaches

ApproachProcedureIndicationsKey Points
AnteriorACDF (Anterior Cervical Discectomy & Fusion)1–2 level disc herniation, cervical radiculopathy/myelopathy from anterior compressionMost commonly performed cervical spine surgery; removes disc + fuses adjacent vertebrae with graft/plate; Smith-Robinson approach
AnteriorCervical corpectomyVertebral body pathology, retrovertebral disc, OPLL spanning disc space, tumorRemoves entire vertebral body + adjacent discs; higher pseudarthrosis rate than ACDF
AnteriorCervical disc replacement (arthroplasty)Single/two-level cervical disease in appropriate candidatePreserves motion; may reduce adjacent segment disease; contraindicated if facet arthropathy, instability, or ossification
PosteriorLaminectomy + fusion≥3 level cervical stenosis; any alignmentWide decompression; requires fusion with lateral mass or pedicle screws to prevent post-laminectomy kyphosis
PosteriorLaminoplasty≥3 level cervical stenosis; preserved lordosis requiredExpands canal without removing lamina (open-door or French-door technique); preserves motion; NOT for kyphotic spines

Lumbar Spine Approaches

ApproachProcedureKey Features
PosteriorPLIF (Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion)Bilateral approach through the spinal canal; higher retraction of neural elements; good for central pathology
PosteriorTLIF (Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion)Unilateral approach through the foramen; less neural retraction than PLIF; most popular lumbar fusion technique
LateralLLIF/XLIF (Lateral/Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion)Traverses psoas muscle; risk of lumbar plexus injury; cannot access L5–S1 (iliac crest blocks access); good for coronal deformity correction
AnteriorALIF (Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion)Retroperitoneal or transperitoneal approach; best access to L5–S1; risk of vascular injury (iliac vessels), retrograde ejaculation in males

ACDF Complications

  • Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury: hoarseness; more common with right-sided approach (due to nerve course variability); transient in most cases
  • Dysphagia: most common complication (up to 50% transient); usually resolves within weeks
  • Esophageal perforation: rare but serious
  • Vertebral artery injury: rare; risk with far-lateral dissection
  • Adjacent segment disease: long-term degeneration above/below the fusion
💎 Board Pearl
  • ACDF is the most commonly performed cervical spine surgery and the first-line surgical option for 1–2 level anterior cervical pathology
  • Laminoplasty requires preserved cervical lordosis — it will not work in kyphotic spines because the cord cannot drift posteriorly away from anterior compression
  • LLIF/XLIF cannot access L5–S1 due to the iliac crest; ALIF is preferred for this level
  • Right-sided ACDF approach has a slightly higher risk of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy because the right RLN does not loop under the aortic arch and has a more variable course
Fusion vs. Non-Fusion

When to Fuse

Indication for FusionRationaleExample
InstabilityAbnormal motion compromises neural elementsSpondylolisthesis, post-traumatic instability, rheumatoid atlantoaxial subluxation
Deformity correctionMaintain corrected alignmentKyphosis correction, scoliosis surgery
Post-tumor resectionLoss of structural support after vertebral body resectionCorpectomy for metastatic disease
Multilevel decompressionRisk of post-laminectomy kyphosisCervical laminectomy ≥3 levels → add lateral mass/pedicle screw fixation
Recurrent disc herniationFailed prior decompression aloneRepeat surgery at same level

When NOT to Fuse

  • Simple lumbar disc herniation: discectomy/microdiscectomy alone is sufficient
  • Single-level lumbar laminectomy: no evidence of benefit from adding fusion if spine is stable
  • No instability on flexion/extension imaging
  • Laminoplasty: inherently motion-preserving; does not require fusion

Instrumentation

  • Pedicle screws: strongest posterior fixation point; placed through vertebral pedicle into body; used with rods for posterior stabilization
  • Lateral mass screws: used in subaxial cervical spine (C3–C6) where pedicles are too small for pedicle screws
  • Interbody cages: structural spacer placed in disc space; filled with bone graft; restores disc height and provides anterior column support
  • Bone graft options: autograft (iliac crest — gold standard), allograft, BMP-2 (bone morphogenetic protein); BMP-2 has complications including heterotopic ossification and swelling

Adjacent Segment Disease (ASD)

  • Accelerated degeneration of levels adjacent to a fusion due to increased biomechanical stress
  • Radiographic changes in up to 25–30% at 10 years; symptomatic ASD in ~10%
  • More common with longer fusion constructs and multilevel fusions
  • Motion preservation (disc arthroplasty, laminoplasty) may reduce ASD risk — theoretical benefit, long-term data still accumulating
💎 Board Pearl
  • Adjacent segment disease is the major long-term consequence of spinal fusion — levels above and below the fusion bear increased mechanical stress
  • Cervical laminectomy without fusion in ≥3 levels risks post-laminectomy kyphosis — always consider adding posterior fixation
  • Fusion is NOT needed for a simple, first-time lumbar microdiscectomy with a stable spine
Cauda Equina Syndrome — Emergency Decompression

Clinical Presentation

  • Classic triad: bilateral lower extremity weakness/pain, saddle anesthesia (S2–S5), bladder dysfunction
  • Red flags requiring urgent imaging:
    • Bilateral sciatica (especially new onset)
    • Saddle anesthesia or perineal numbness
    • Urinary retention (most consistent finding) with overflow incontinence
    • Decreased rectal tone / fecal incontinence
    • Progressive bilateral leg weakness
    • Sexual dysfunction (new onset)
  • Most common cause: large central lumbar disc herniation (most often L4–L5 or L5–S1)
  • Other causes: spinal epidural abscess, epidural hematoma, tumor, spinal stenosis, post-surgical

Incomplete vs. Complete CES

TypeDefinitionPrognosis
CES-Incomplete (CES-I)Urinary difficulties (urgency, poor stream, straining) but ability to void presentBetter outcomes; higher chance of bladder recovery if decompressed early
CES-Retention (CES-R)Painless urinary retention with overflow incontinence; atonic bladderWorse prognosis; lower rate of full bladder recovery even with prompt surgery

Diagnosis

  • MRI is the study of choice — demonstrates level and cause of compression
  • CT myelogram if MRI contraindicated
  • Post-void residual >200 mL supports diagnosis in equivocal cases
  • Do NOT delay imaging for urodynamics or EMG

Surgical Timing

  • Surgical emergency: decompression ideally within 24 hours of symptom onset
  • Earlier surgery (<24 hours) associated with better neurological and bladder outcomes in most studies
  • Surgery within 24–48 hours is still beneficial; outcomes decline significantly after 48 hours
  • CES-I → CES-R conversion can occur rapidly — argue for earliest possible decompression to prevent progression
  • Standard procedure: wide laminectomy with discectomy at the affected level
Clinical Pearl
  • Urinary retention is the most reliable sign of cauda equina syndrome — always check a post-void residual in patients with acute back pain and bilateral leg symptoms
  • A patient with back pain, bilateral sciatica, and new urinary symptoms needs an emergent MRI — do not wait for outpatient workup
💎 Board Pearl
  • Cauda equina syndrome = surgical emergency; decompression within 24 hours is the goal; CES-Incomplete has better prognosis than CES-Retention
  • Most common cause: large central lumbar disc herniation at L4–L5 or L5–S1
  • MRI is the study of choice — never delay imaging in suspected CES
  • Bladder function recovery correlates most strongly with preoperative bladder status (incomplete > retention) and timing of surgery
Cervical Myelopathy

Definition & Pathophysiology

  • Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM): most common cause of spinal cord dysfunction in adults >55 years
  • Chronic compression of the cervical spinal cord from degenerative changes: disc herniation, osteophyte formation, ligamentum flavum hypertrophy, OPLL
  • Cord compression → demyelination → axonal loss → gliosis; often irreversible once established
  • Cord signal change on T2 MRI indicates myelomalacia/gliosis; T1 hypointensity = worse prognosis

Clinical Features

  • Gait dysfunction (broad-based, spastic); often the earliest motor finding
  • Hand clumsiness / loss of fine motor dexterity (myelopathy hand — grip-and-release test; finger escape sign)
  • Upper motor neuron signs: hyperreflexia, Hoffman sign, clonus, Babinski, spastic tone
  • Lhermitte sign (electric shock sensation with neck flexion)
  • Sensory changes: numbness, paresthesias in hands; posterior column dysfunction
  • Bowel/bladder dysfunction: late finding indicating severe myelopathy

Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) Score

SeveritymJOA ScoreManagement
Mild≥15 (out of 18)Non-operative monitoring with serial exams + MRI; surgery if progression
Moderate12–14Surgical decompression recommended
Severe<12Surgical decompression strongly recommended; outcomes worse than moderate but still beneficial

Surgical Approach Selection

ScenarioPreferred ApproachRationale
1–2 level anterior compressionACDFDirectly addresses anterior pathology; high fusion rate
≥3 levels, preserved lordosisLaminoplastyMotion-preserving; canal expansion; lower ASD risk
≥3 levels, kyphotic or neutralLaminectomy + posterior fusionLaminoplasty contraindicated in kyphosis; fusion prevents progression
≥3 levels with significant anterior compressionCombined anterior-posterior or stagedAnterior corpectomy + posterior stabilization for circumferential disease
OPLL (ossification of PLL)Posterior if <60% canal; anterior if focalAnterior approach risks CSF leak with OPLL adherent to dura

Key Considerations

  • Natural history: CSM is generally progressive; stepwise deterioration is the most common pattern; rarely improves spontaneously
  • Earlier surgery = better outcomes: patients with shorter symptom duration and less cord damage have better surgical results
  • Collar immobilization does not treat myelopathy; used only for temporary stabilization in trauma or post-operatively
💎 Board Pearl
  • mJOA <15 = surgery; mJOA ≥15 = reasonable to observe if stable, but counsel that CSM rarely improves spontaneously
  • T2 hyperintensity in the cord = myelomalacia/gliosis; additional T1 hypointensity = worse prognosis and more advanced disease
  • Hoffman sign (thumb/index finger flexion with flicking middle finger DIP) is one of the most sensitive clinical signs of cervical myelopathy
  • OPLL is more common in East Asian populations; posterior approach preferred if ≥60% canal compromise to avoid dural tear with anterior approach
Spinal Cord Compression — Metastatic Disease

Epidemiology & Presentation

  • Metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) occurs in 5–10% of cancer patients
  • Most common primary tumors: lung, breast, prostate, renal cell, multiple myeloma
  • Thoracic spine is the most common location (~60%), followed by lumbar and cervical
  • Back pain is the earliest and most common symptom (>90%); precedes neurologic deficits by weeks to months
  • Progressive weakness, sensory level, bowel/bladder dysfunction indicate cord compression

NOMS Decision Framework

ComponentAssessmentImplications
N — NeurologicASIA scale; radiculopathy vs. myelopathy; functional statusHigh-grade cord compression with neurologic deficit → urgent surgical consideration
O — OncologicTumor histology and radiosensitivityRadiosensitive (lymphoma, myeloma, seminoma, small cell) → radiation; radioresistant (RCC, melanoma, sarcoma) → surgery + stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)
M — Mechanical stabilitySINS score (Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score)SINS 0–6 = stable; 7–12 = potentially unstable (surgical consult); 13–18 = unstable (stabilization needed)
S — Systemic diseaseOverall prognosis, comorbidities, life expectancyExpected survival <3 months or poor functional status → favor non-operative management; good prognosis → more aggressive surgery

SINS (Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score)

ParameterOptions & Points
LocationJunctional (C0–C2, C7–T2, T11–L1, L5–S1) = 3; mobile spine (C3–C6, L2–L4) = 2; semi-rigid (T3–T10) = 1; rigid (S2–S5) = 0
PainMechanical = 3; occasional/non-mechanical = 1; pain-free = 0
Bone lesion typeLytic = 2; mixed = 1; blastic = 0
AlignmentSubluxation/translation = 4; de novo deformity (kyphosis/scoliosis) = 2; normal = 0
Vertebral body collapse>50% = 3; <50% = 2; none but >50% involved = 1; none = 0
Posterolateral involvementBilateral = 3; unilateral = 1; none = 0
  • SINS 0–6: stable — no surgical stabilization needed
  • SINS 7–12: potentially unstable — surgical consultation
  • SINS 13–18: unstable — surgical stabilization indicated

The Patchell Trial (2005)

  • Design: RCT comparing direct decompressive surgery + postoperative RT vs. RT alone for single-level MESCC
  • Key finding: surgery + RT group had significantly more patients who regained/retained ability to walk (84% vs. 57%)
  • Surgery group also had: longer ambulatory duration, longer survival, reduced need for opioids and corticosteroids
  • Inclusion: single area of cord compression, at least one neurologic sign, not totally paraplegic for >48 hours
  • Exclusion: radiosensitive tumors (lymphoma, myeloma, leukemia, germ cell), multiple areas of cord compression
  • Conclusion: surgery + RT is standard of care for single-level MESCC from radioresistant tumors in surgical candidates

Management Summary

ScenarioManagement
Acute/progressive neurologic deficitUrgent surgical decompression ± stabilization + dexamethasone
Radioresistant tumor + mechanical instabilitySurgery + SRS or conventional RT
Radiosensitive tumor (lymphoma, myeloma)Radiation ± chemotherapy; surgery if mechanically unstable
Poor surgical candidate / poor prognosisRadiation + steroids + supportive care
No neurologic deficit + stable spineConventional RT or SRS; monitor closely

Steroids in Metastatic Cord Compression

  • Dexamethasone started immediately upon diagnosis (loading dose 10 mg IV, then 4 mg q6h)
  • Reduces vasogenic edema, provides temporary neurologic improvement
  • Bridge to definitive treatment (surgery or radiation)
Clinical Pearl
  • New back pain in a cancer patient is metastatic disease until proven otherwise — do not dismiss as musculoskeletal without appropriate imaging
  • Start dexamethasone immediately once cord compression is confirmed — do not wait for surgical or radiation planning
💎 Board Pearl
  • Patchell trial: surgery + RT > RT alone for single-level metastatic cord compression (radioresistant tumors); surgery group retained ambulation (84% vs. 57%)
  • SINS ≥7 = potentially unstable → surgical consultation; SINS ≥13 = unstable → stabilization indicated
  • Radiosensitive tumors (lymphoma, myeloma, seminoma) can be treated with radiation alone unless mechanically unstable
  • Thoracic spine is the most common location for spinal metastases (~60%)
Lumbar Spine Conditions

Lumbar Disc Herniation

  • Natural history: most improve with conservative treatment over 6–12 weeks; disc resorption occurs in up to 60–70% over time
  • Surgical indications:
    • Refractory radiculopathy after ≥6 weeks of conservative management
    • Progressive motor deficit (e.g., foot drop)
    • Cauda equina syndrome (emergency)
    • Intractable pain significantly impairing function
  • SPORT trial (Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial):
    • Surgery provides faster pain relief and functional improvement at 3 months and 1 year
    • By 4–8 years, outcomes tend to converge between surgical and non-operative groups (intent-to-treat analysis)
    • High crossover rate (~40% non-operative crossed to surgery) complicated interpretation
    • As-treated analysis favored surgery at all time points

Surgical Techniques for Disc Herniation

TechniqueDescriptionKey Points
MicrodiscectomySmall incision, microscope-assisted removal of herniated fragmentGold standard surgical treatment; 85–90% success rate for radiculopathy; low complication rate
Standard discectomyOpen approach with removal of herniated materialLargely replaced by microdiscectomy in modern practice
Endoscopic discectomyMinimally invasive, endoscope-guided removalShorter recovery; smaller incision; growing adoption; steep learning curve
  • Recurrence rate: 5–15% after microdiscectomy; recurrent herniation at same level may eventually require fusion

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

  • Neurogenic claudication: bilateral leg pain/heaviness/numbness worsened by walking and standing, relieved by sitting or leaning forward (flexion opens the canal)
  • Differentiate from vascular claudication: neurogenic relieved by sitting/flexion; vascular relieved by standing still (no need to sit)
  • Conservative treatment: PT, epidural steroid injections, activity modification; reasonable for mild-moderate symptoms
  • Surgical indication: neurogenic claudication refractory to ≥3 months conservative treatment with significant functional limitation
  • SPORT trial for stenosis: surgery (decompressive laminectomy) associated with greater improvement in pain and function compared to non-operative care at all time points up to 8 years
  • Procedure: lumbar laminectomy (decompression) at affected levels; fusion added only if concurrent instability or spondylolisthesis

Spondylolisthesis

  • Definition: anterior slippage of one vertebral body on another
  • Most common types:
    • Isthmic (Type II): pars interarticularis defect (spondylolysis); most common at L5–S1; typical in young athletes (gymnasts, football linemen)
    • Degenerative (Type III): facet joint arthropathy; most common at L4–L5; more common in women >50
  • Meyerding classification: Grade I (<25% slip), Grade II (25–50%), Grade III (50–75%), Grade IV (75–100%), Grade V (spondyloptosis = complete slip)

Surgical Management by Grade

GradeManagement
Grade I–II (low grade)Conservative treatment first; surgery (decompression + fusion) if symptomatic with refractory radiculopathy/claudication or progressive slip
Grade III–IV (high grade)Surgical management recommended — decompression + instrumented fusion with possible reduction
Grade V (spondyloptosis)Always surgical; reduction + fusion; high complication rate including L5 nerve root stretch injury
💎 Board Pearl
  • SPORT trial: for lumbar disc herniation, surgery provides faster recovery but long-term outcomes converge; for lumbar stenosis, surgery was superior at all time points
  • Neurogenic vs. vascular claudication: neurogenic = relieved by sitting/flexion (shopping cart sign); vascular = relieved by simply standing still
  • Isthmic spondylolisthesis = pars defect; most common at L5–S1; degenerative spondylolisthesis = facet arthropathy; most common at L4–L5
  • High-grade spondylolisthesis (Grade III–V) is essentially always a surgical indication
  • Microdiscectomy is the gold standard surgical treatment for lumbar disc herniation — 85–90% success rate for radiculopathy
Surgical Urgency Classification

Spine Surgery Urgency

UrgencyTimeframeConditions
Emergent (<24 hours)Immediate / within hoursCauda equina syndrome; acute spinal cord compression with progressive deficit; epidural abscess with neurologic compromise; unstable spine fracture with cord compression
Urgent (24–72 hours)Within 1–3 daysMetastatic cord compression with new deficit (Patchell criteria); progressive myelopathy; acute disc herniation with motor deficit (e.g., foot drop)
Semi-urgent (1–4 weeks)Prompt schedulingProgressive cervical myelopathy (moderate-severe mJOA); worsening spondylolisthesis with neurologic symptoms
ElectiveWeeks to monthsRefractory radiculopathy after conservative failure; neurogenic claudication failing conservative management; stable spondylolisthesis with chronic symptoms
💎 Board Pearl
  • Three absolute surgical emergencies in spine: cauda equina syndrome, epidural abscess with neurologic deficit, and acute cord compression with progressive deficit
  • Timing matters most in cauda equina syndrome — decompress within 24 hours; CES-Incomplete has a narrow window before converting to CES-Retention
  • For metastatic cord compression, start dexamethasone immediately and arrange urgent surgical evaluation (do not wait for tumor board)