Spine Surgery
Spine Surgery
What Do You Need to Know?
- ACDF is the workhorse for 1–2 level cervical disc herniation causing radiculopathy or myelopathy; posterior approaches (laminectomy/laminoplasty) are preferred for ≥3 levels
- Cauda equina syndrome is a surgical emergency — bilateral leg pain/weakness, saddle anesthesia, urinary retention; decompression ideally within 24 hours
- Cervical myelopathy: surgery indicated for moderate-severe disease (mJOA <15) or progressive deficits; approach dictated by number of levels and alignment
- Fusion indications: instability, spondylolisthesis, deformity correction, post-tumor resection; avoid unnecessary fusion (risk of adjacent segment disease)
- Metastatic cord compression: NOMS framework guides management; Patchell trial showed surgery + RT superior to RT alone for single-level compression
- SPORT trial: surgery for lumbar disc herniation provides faster improvement but long-term outcomes converge with conservative treatment
🚩 Don’t Miss — Test-Day Priorities
- Cauda equina syndrome: bilateral LE weakness + saddle anesthesia + urinary retention/incontinence + bowel dysfunction → EMERGENT MRI + decompression within 24–48h; central disc herniation at L4–L5 / L5–S1 most common culprit
- Metastatic epidural cord compression: give dexamethasone 16 mg/day promptly (oral or equivalent IV) for suspected MSCC with neurologic symptoms/signs (NICE NG234); avoid steroids before tissue diagnosis when lymphoma is suspected unless urgent neurologic compromise requires treatment; urgent MRI whole spine + neurosurgery and rad-onc consult for decompression and/or radiation (Patchell — surgery + RT > RT alone)
- Spinal epidural abscess: back pain + fever + neuro deficit in IV drug use / diabetes / recent procedure → urgent contrast MRI and antibiotics required; surgical drainage plus antibiotics is standard when there is neurologic deficit, progression, spinal instability, sepsis, or failure of medical therapy; carefully selected neurologically intact patients with an identified organism and close monitoring may be treated medically
- Cervical myelopathy: progressive gait/balance loss + hand clumsiness + Hoffmann/Babinski + hyperreflexia + Lhermitte; T2 cord hyperintensity at compression level → surgical decompression (ACDF for 1–2 levels, laminoplasty/laminectomy + fusion for ≥3 levels)
- Anterior spinal cord infarction: abdominal aortic dissection / cross-clamp / atherosclerosis → paraplegia + bilateral pain/temperature loss + sphincter dysfunction with PRESERVED proprioception/vibration (dorsal columns spared)
- Lumbar stenosis: neurogenic claudication worse with standing/walking, better with FLEXION/sitting (shopping-cart sign); MRI confirms; conservative first, laminectomy ± fusion if recalcitrant
- Chiari I: cerebellar tonsils >5 mm below foramen magnum + tussive (Valsalva-induced) occipital headache + neck pain + ataxia ± syrinx → suboccipital decompression (duraplasty vs not is controversial)
- Syringomyelia: central cord cavity → suspended bilateral UE dissociated sensory loss (pain/temp lost, vibration/proprioception spared) + LMN weakness ± Charcot joints; address underlying Chiari / tethered cord / post-traumatic etiology
- Spinal dural AVF: progressive myelopathy from venous hypertension → conus medullaris T2 hyperintensity + serpiginous dorsal flow voids; surgical clipping or endovascular embolization
- Spondylolisthesis: degenerative (older, L4–L5) vs isthmic (young, pars defect at L5–S1) → FUSION if neurologic deficit + significant slip / instability
🔍 Buzzwords & Pathognomonic FindingsClinical · Imaging / decision · Surgical approach
Clinical clues
- Saddle anesthesia + urinary retention + bilateral LE weakness → Cauda equina syndrome
- Hand clumsiness + gait imbalance + Hoffmann/Babinski + Lhermitte → Cervical myelopathy
- Shopping-cart sign / better with flexion-sitting, worse with standing-walking → Neurogenic claudication from lumbar stenosis
- Tussive (Valsalva-induced) occipital headache + neck pain ± ataxia → Chiari malformation type I
- Suspended bilateral UE dissociated sensory loss + LMN weakness ± Charcot joints → Syringomyelia
- Paraplegia + bilateral pain/temp loss with preserved proprioception/vibration after aortic surgery → Anterior spinal cord infarction
- Back pain + fever + neuro deficit in IVDU/diabetic → Spinal epidural abscess
- Progressive lower-extremity myelopathy in older man, often misdiagnosed as stenosis → Spinal dural AVF
Imaging / decision
- Cerebellar tonsils >5 mm below foramen magnum on sagittal MRI → Chiari I (consider suboccipital decompression)
- T2 cord hyperintensity at compression level → Cervical myelopathy — surgical indication
- Serpiginous dorsal flow voids + conus T2 hyperintensity → Spinal dural AVF
- Central canal expansion with fluid-filled cavity / cyst within cord → Intramedullary tumor (ependymoma, astrocytoma) vs syrinx
- Eccentric dural-based extramedullary mass → Meningioma / schwannoma (intradural extramedullary)
- Vertebral body destruction / pedicle erosion with epidural soft tissue → Extradural metastasis — STAT dexamethasone + MRI whole spine
- Pars interarticularis defect on oblique X-ray (“Scotty dog collar”) → Isthmic spondylolisthesis
- Rim-enhancing dorsal epidural collection on MRI with contrast → Spinal epidural abscess
Surgical approach / pearls
- ACDF (Smith-Robinson) → 1–2 level anterior cervical disc/myelopathy — workhorse cervical operation
- Laminoplasty → ≥3 level cervical stenosis with PRESERVED lordosis (fails in kyphosis — cord can’t drift back)
- Laminectomy + posterior fusion → Multilevel cervical stenosis with kyphosis or instability
- TLIF vs PLIF → TLIF (unilateral, less neural retraction) is the most popular lumbar fusion; PLIF for central pathology
- ALIF → Best access to L5–S1 (LLIF/XLIF blocked by iliac crest); watch for vascular injury and retrograde ejaculation
- Suboccipital decompression ± duraplasty → Chiari I with symptoms or syrinx
- Surgical clipping or endovascular embolization → Spinal dural AVF
- Pedicle screws + rods (instrumentation) → Fusion construct — watch for pseudarthrosis, hardware failure, adjacent segment disease, infection
Anterior vs. Posterior Approach
Decision Framework
- Key principle: approach from the direction of the compressive pathology
- Anterior compression (disc herniation, osteophyte, vertebral body pathology) → anterior approach
- Posterior compression (ligamentum flavum hypertrophy, facet overgrowth, multilevel stenosis) → posterior approach
- Circumferential compression: may require combined or staged approach
- Other factors: number of levels, sagittal alignment (lordosis vs. kyphosis), prior surgery, medical comorbidities
Cervical Spine Approaches
| Approach | Procedure | Indications | Key Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anterior | ACDF (Anterior Cervical Discectomy & Fusion) | 1–2 level disc herniation, cervical radiculopathy/myelopathy from anterior compression | Most commonly performed cervical spine surgery; removes disc + fuses adjacent vertebrae with graft/plate; Smith-Robinson approach |
| Anterior | Cervical corpectomy | Vertebral body pathology, retrovertebral disc, OPLL spanning disc space, tumor | Removes entire vertebral body + adjacent discs; higher pseudarthrosis rate than ACDF |
| Anterior | Cervical disc replacement (arthroplasty) | Single/two-level cervical disease in appropriate candidate | Preserves motion; may reduce adjacent segment disease; contraindicated if facet arthropathy, instability, or ossification |
| Posterior | Laminectomy + fusion | ≥3 level cervical stenosis; any alignment | Wide decompression; requires fusion with lateral mass or pedicle screws to prevent post-laminectomy kyphosis |
| Posterior | Laminoplasty | ≥3 level cervical stenosis; preserved lordosis required | Expands canal without removing lamina (open-door or French-door technique); preserves motion; NOT for kyphotic spines |
Lumbar Spine Approaches
| Approach | Procedure | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| Posterior | PLIF (Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion) | Bilateral approach through the spinal canal; higher retraction of neural elements; good for central pathology |
| Posterior | TLIF (Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion) | Unilateral approach through the foramen; less neural retraction than PLIF; most popular lumbar fusion technique |
| Lateral | LLIF/XLIF (Lateral/Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion) | Traverses psoas muscle; risk of lumbar plexus injury; cannot access L5–S1 (iliac crest blocks access); good for coronal deformity correction |
| Anterior | ALIF (Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion) | Retroperitoneal or transperitoneal approach; best access to L5–S1; risk of vascular injury (iliac vessels), retrograde ejaculation in males |
ACDF Complications
- Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury: hoarseness; historically taught to be more common with right-sided approach due to RLN course variability, but current evidence shows no significant difference between sides. Surgeon preference and prior neck surgery typically dictate side. Transient in most cases.
- Dysphagia: most common complication — early postoperative dysphagia up to 50% (most resolves over weeks to months); persistent dysphagia at 1 year ~5–15%
- Esophageal perforation: rare but serious
- Vertebral artery injury: rare; risk with far-lateral dissection
- Adjacent segment disease: long-term degeneration above/below the fusion
💎 Board Pearl
- ACDF is the most commonly performed cervical spine surgery and the first-line surgical option for 1–2 level anterior cervical pathology
- Laminoplasty requires preserved cervical lordosis — it will not work in kyphotic spines because the cord cannot drift posteriorly away from anterior compression
- LLIF/XLIF cannot access L5–S1 due to the iliac crest; ALIF is preferred for this level
- Recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy was historically taught to be more common with right-sided ACDF due to RLN course variability, but current evidence shows no significant difference between sides — side selection is now driven by surgeon preference and prior neck surgery
Fusion vs. Non-Fusion
When to Fuse
| Indication for Fusion | Rationale | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Instability | Abnormal motion compromises neural elements | Spondylolisthesis, post-traumatic instability, rheumatoid atlantoaxial subluxation |
| Deformity correction | Maintain corrected alignment | Kyphosis correction, scoliosis surgery |
| Post-tumor resection | Loss of structural support after vertebral body resection | Corpectomy for metastatic disease |
| Multilevel decompression | Risk of post-laminectomy kyphosis | Cervical laminectomy ≥3 levels → add lateral mass/pedicle screw fixation |
| Recurrent disc herniation | Failed prior decompression alone | Repeat surgery at same level |
When NOT to Fuse
- Simple lumbar disc herniation: discectomy/microdiscectomy alone is sufficient
- Single-level lumbar laminectomy: no evidence of benefit from adding fusion if spine is stable
- No instability on flexion/extension imaging
- Laminoplasty: inherently motion-preserving; does not require fusion
Instrumentation
- Pedicle screws: strongest posterior fixation point; placed through vertebral pedicle into body; used with rods for posterior stabilization
- Lateral mass screws: used in subaxial cervical spine (C3–C7) where pedicles are too small for pedicle screws; C7 lateral mass is thinner than C3–C6, so pedicle screws are sometimes preferred at C7 for stronger fixation
- Interbody cages: structural spacer placed in disc space; filled with bone graft; restores disc height and provides anterior column support
- Bone graft options: autograft (iliac crest — gold standard), allograft, BMP-2 (bone morphogenetic protein); BMP-2 has complications including heterotopic ossification and swelling
Adjacent Segment Disease (ASD)
- Accelerated degeneration of levels adjacent to a fusion due to increased biomechanical stress
- Radiographic changes in up to 25–30% at 10 years; symptomatic ASD in ~10%
- More common with longer fusion constructs and multilevel fusions
- Motion preservation (disc arthroplasty, laminoplasty) may reduce ASD risk — theoretical benefit, long-term data still accumulating
💎 Board Pearl
- Adjacent segment disease is the major long-term consequence of spinal fusion — levels above and below the fusion bear increased mechanical stress
- Cervical laminectomy without fusion in ≥3 levels risks post-laminectomy kyphosis — always consider adding posterior fixation
- Fusion is NOT needed for a simple, first-time lumbar microdiscectomy with a stable spine
Cauda Equina Syndrome — Emergency Decompression
Clinical Presentation
- Classic triad: bilateral lower extremity weakness/pain, saddle anesthesia (S2–S5), bladder dysfunction
- Red flags requiring urgent imaging:
- Bilateral sciatica (especially new onset)
- Saddle anesthesia or perineal numbness
- Urinary retention (most consistent finding) with overflow incontinence
- Decreased rectal tone / fecal incontinence
- Progressive bilateral leg weakness
- Sexual dysfunction (new onset)
- Most common cause: large central lumbar disc herniation (most often L4–L5 or L5–S1)
- Other causes: spinal epidural abscess, epidural hematoma, tumor, spinal stenosis, post-surgical
Incomplete vs. Complete CES
| Type | Definition | Prognosis |
|---|---|---|
| CES-Incomplete (CES-I) | Urinary difficulties (urgency, poor stream, straining) but ability to void present | Better outcomes; higher chance of bladder recovery if decompressed early |
| CES-Retention (CES-R) | Painless urinary retention with overflow incontinence; atonic bladder | Worse prognosis; lower rate of full bladder recovery even with prompt surgery |
Diagnosis
- MRI is the study of choice — demonstrates level and cause of compression
- CT myelogram if MRI contraindicated
- Post-void residual >200 mL supports diagnosis in equivocal cases
- Do NOT delay imaging for urodynamics or EMG
Surgical Timing
- Surgical emergency: decompression ideally within 24 hours of symptom onset
- Earlier surgery (<24 hours) associated with better neurological and bladder outcomes in most studies
- Surgery within 24–48 hours is still beneficial; outcomes decline significantly after 48 hours
- CES-I → CES-R conversion can occur rapidly — argue for earliest possible decompression to prevent progression
- Standard procedure: wide laminectomy with discectomy at the affected level
Clinical Pearl
- Urinary retention is the most reliable sign of cauda equina syndrome — always check a post-void residual in patients with acute back pain and bilateral leg symptoms
- A patient with back pain, bilateral sciatica, and new urinary symptoms needs an emergent MRI — do not wait for outpatient workup
💎 Board Pearl
- Cauda equina syndrome = surgical emergency; decompression within 24 hours is the goal; CES-Incomplete has better prognosis than CES-Retention
- Most common cause: large central lumbar disc herniation at L4–L5 or L5–S1
- MRI is the study of choice — never delay imaging in suspected CES
- Bladder function recovery correlates most strongly with preoperative bladder status (incomplete > retention) and timing of surgery
Cervical Myelopathy
Definition & Pathophysiology
- Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM): most common cause of spinal cord dysfunction in adults >55 years
- Chronic compression of the cervical spinal cord from degenerative changes: disc herniation, osteophyte formation, ligamentum flavum hypertrophy, OPLL
- Cord compression → demyelination → axonal loss → gliosis; often irreversible once established
- Cord signal change on T2 MRI indicates myelomalacia/gliosis; T1 hypointensity = worse prognosis
Clinical Features
- Gait dysfunction (broad-based, spastic); often the earliest motor finding
- Hand clumsiness / loss of fine motor dexterity (myelopathy hand — grip-and-release test; finger escape sign)
- Upper motor neuron signs: hyperreflexia, Hoffman sign, clonus, Babinski, spastic tone
- Lhermitte sign (electric shock sensation with neck flexion)
- Sensory changes: numbness, paresthesias in hands; posterior column dysfunction
- Bowel/bladder dysfunction: late finding indicating severe myelopathy
Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) Score
| Severity | mJOA Score | Management |
|---|---|---|
| Mild | ≥15 (out of 18) | Non-operative monitoring with serial exams + MRI; surgery if progression |
| Moderate | 12–14 | Surgical decompression recommended |
| Severe | <12 | Surgical decompression strongly recommended; outcomes worse than moderate but still beneficial |
Surgical Approach Selection
| Scenario | Preferred Approach | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| 1–2 level anterior compression | ACDF | Directly addresses anterior pathology; high fusion rate |
| ≥3 levels, preserved lordosis | Laminoplasty | Motion-preserving; canal expansion; lower ASD risk |
| ≥3 levels, kyphotic or neutral | Laminectomy + posterior fusion | Laminoplasty contraindicated in kyphosis; fusion prevents progression |
| ≥3 levels with significant anterior compression | Combined anterior-posterior or staged | Anterior corpectomy + posterior stabilization for circumferential disease |
| OPLL (ossification of PLL) | Posterior if ≥60% canal occupation or K-line negative; anterior if focal/low canal occupation (<50–60%) and K-line positive | Anterior approach risks CSF leak with OPLL adherent to dura; K-line (line from C2 to C7 spinal canal midpoints) negative = OPLL crosses the line → posterior decompression alone may be insufficient |
Key Considerations
- Natural history: CSM is generally progressive; stepwise deterioration is the most common pattern; rarely improves spontaneously
- Earlier surgery = better outcomes: patients with shorter symptom duration and less cord damage have better surgical results
- Collar immobilization does not treat myelopathy; used only for temporary stabilization in trauma or post-operatively
💎 Board Pearl
- mJOA <15 = surgery; mJOA ≥15 = reasonable to observe if stable, but counsel that CSM rarely improves spontaneously
- T2 hyperintensity in the cord = myelomalacia/gliosis; additional T1 hypointensity = worse prognosis and more advanced disease
- Hoffman sign (thumb/index finger flexion with flicking middle finger DIP) is one of the most sensitive clinical signs of cervical myelopathy
- OPLL is more common in East Asian populations; posterior approach preferred if ≥60% canal occupation or K-line negative; anterior approach reserved for focal/low canal occupation (<50–60%) and K-line positive disease (anterior carries higher dural tear/CSF leak risk when OPLL is adherent)
Spinal Cord Compression — Metastatic Disease
Epidemiology & Presentation
- Metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) occurs in 5–10% of cancer patients
- Most common primary tumors: lung, breast, prostate, renal cell, multiple myeloma
- Thoracic spine is the most common location (~60%), followed by lumbar and cervical
- Back pain is the earliest and most common symptom (>90%); precedes neurologic deficits by weeks to months
- Progressive weakness, sensory level, bowel/bladder dysfunction indicate cord compression
NOMS Decision Framework
| Component | Assessment | Implications |
|---|---|---|
| N — Neurologic | Bilsky ESCC (Epidural Spinal Cord Compression) grade (0–3) plus presence/absence of myelopathy or functional radiculopathy | Bilsky 0 = bone only; 1 = epidural impingement without cord deformity (1a/1b/1c); 2 = cord deformation with CSF visible; 3 = cord deformation with no CSF visible. High-grade ESCC (2–3) with myelopathy → urgent surgical decompression / separation surgery |
| O — Oncologic | Tumor histology and radiosensitivity | Radiosensitive (lymphoma, myeloma, seminoma, small cell) → radiation; radioresistant (RCC, melanoma, sarcoma) → surgery + stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) |
| M — Mechanical stability | SINS score (Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score) | SINS 0–6 = stable; 7–12 = potentially unstable (surgical consult); 13–18 = unstable (stabilization needed) |
| S — Systemic disease | Overall prognosis, comorbidities, life expectancy | Expected survival <3 months or poor functional status → favor non-operative management; good prognosis → more aggressive surgery |
SINS (Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score)
| Parameter | Options & Points |
|---|---|
| Location | Junctional (C0–C2, C7–T2, T11–L1 only) = 3; mobile spine (C3–C6, L2–L4) = 2; semi-rigid (T3–T10) = 1; rigid (S2–S5) = 0 |
| Pain | Mechanical = 3; occasional/non-mechanical = 1; pain-free = 0 |
| Bone lesion type | Lytic = 2; mixed = 1; blastic = 0 |
| Alignment | Subluxation/translation = 4; de novo deformity (kyphosis/scoliosis) = 2; normal = 0 |
| Vertebral body collapse | >50% = 3; <50% = 2; none but >50% involved = 1; none = 0 |
| Posterolateral involvement | Bilateral = 3; unilateral = 1; none = 0 |
- SINS 0–6: stable — no surgical stabilization needed
- SINS 7–12: potentially unstable — surgical consultation
- SINS 13–18: unstable — surgical stabilization indicated
The Patchell Trial (2005)
- Design: RCT comparing direct decompressive surgery + postoperative RT vs. RT alone for single-level MESCC
- Key finding: surgery + RT group had significantly more patients who regained/retained ability to walk (84% vs. 57%)
- Surgery group also had: longer ambulatory duration, longer survival, reduced need for opioids and corticosteroids
- Inclusion: single area of cord compression, at least one neurologic sign
- Exclusion: radiosensitive tumors (lymphoma, myeloma, leukemia, germ cell), multiple areas of cord compression; excluded patients who had been completely paraplegic for >48 hours prior to enrollment (these patients were not expected to recover function)
- Conclusion: surgery + RT is standard of care for single-level MESCC from radioresistant tumors in surgical candidates
Management Summary
| Scenario | Management |
|---|---|
| Acute/progressive neurologic deficit | Urgent surgical decompression ± stabilization + dexamethasone |
| Radioresistant tumor + mechanical instability | Surgery + SRS or conventional RT |
| Radiosensitive tumor (lymphoma, myeloma) | Radiation ± chemotherapy; surgery if mechanically unstable |
| Poor surgical candidate / poor prognosis | Radiation + steroids + supportive care |
| No neurologic deficit + stable spine | Conventional RT or SRS; monitor closely |
Steroids in Metastatic Cord Compression
- Dexamethasone started immediately upon diagnosis — higher-dose regimens (96 mg load) have been used historically; current practice favors moderate dosing (10–16 mg load, 16 mg/day) due to side-effect profile
- Reduces vasogenic edema, provides temporary neurologic improvement
- Bridge to definitive treatment (surgery or radiation)
Clinical Pearl
- New back pain in a cancer patient is metastatic disease until proven otherwise — do not dismiss as musculoskeletal without appropriate imaging
- Start dexamethasone immediately once cord compression is confirmed — do not wait for surgical or radiation planning
💎 Board Pearl
- Patchell trial: surgery + RT > RT alone for single-level metastatic cord compression (radioresistant tumors); surgery group retained ambulation (84% vs. 57%)
- SINS ≥7 = potentially unstable → surgical consultation; SINS ≥13 = unstable → stabilization indicated
- Radiosensitive tumors (lymphoma, myeloma, seminoma) can be treated with radiation alone unless mechanically unstable
- Thoracic spine is the most common location for spinal metastases (~60%)
Lumbar Spine Conditions
Lumbar Disc Herniation
- Natural history: most improve with conservative treatment over 6–12 weeks; disc resorption occurs in up to 60–70% over time
- Surgical indications:
- Refractory radiculopathy after ≥6 weeks of conservative management
- Progressive motor deficit (e.g., foot drop)
- Cauda equina syndrome (emergency)
- Intractable pain significantly impairing function
- SPORT trial (Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial):
- Surgery provides faster pain relief and functional improvement at 3 months and 1 year
- By 4–8 years, outcomes tend to converge between surgical and non-operative groups (intent-to-treat analysis)
- High crossover rate (~40% non-operative crossed to surgery) complicated interpretation
- As-treated analysis favored surgery at all time points
Surgical Techniques for Disc Herniation
| Technique | Description | Key Points |
|---|---|---|
| Microdiscectomy | Small incision, microscope-assisted removal of herniated fragment | Gold standard surgical treatment; 85–90% success rate for radiculopathy; low complication rate |
| Standard discectomy | Open approach with removal of herniated material | Largely replaced by microdiscectomy in modern practice |
| Endoscopic discectomy | Minimally invasive, endoscope-guided removal | Shorter recovery; smaller incision; growing adoption; steep learning curve |
- Recurrence rate: 5–15% after microdiscectomy; recurrent herniation at same level may eventually require fusion
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
- Neurogenic claudication: bilateral leg pain/heaviness/numbness worsened by walking and standing, relieved by sitting or leaning forward (flexion opens the canal)
- Differentiate from vascular claudication: neurogenic relieved by sitting/flexion; vascular relieved by standing still (no need to sit)
- Conservative treatment: PT, epidural steroid injections, activity modification; reasonable for mild-moderate symptoms
- Surgical indication: neurogenic claudication refractory to ≥3 months conservative treatment with significant functional limitation
- SPORT trial for stenosis: surgery (decompressive laminectomy) associated with greater improvement in pain and function compared to non-operative care at all time points up to 8 years
- Procedure: lumbar laminectomy (decompression) at affected levels; fusion added only if concurrent instability or spondylolisthesis
Spondylolisthesis
- Definition: anterior slippage of one vertebral body on another
- Wiltse classification (full list):
- Type I — Dysplastic: congenital abnormality of the L5–S1 facets/pars; risk of high-grade slip
- Type II — Isthmic: pars interarticularis defect (spondylolysis); most common at L5–S1; typical in young athletes (gymnasts, football linemen)
- Type III — Degenerative: facet joint arthropathy; most common at L4–L5; more common in women >50
- Type IV — Traumatic: acute fracture of a posterior element (other than pars) producing slip
- Type V — Pathologic: tumor, infection, or metabolic bone disease weakening the posterior elements
- Type VI — Iatrogenic: post-surgical (e.g., after wide decompression or facetectomy)
- Meyerding classification: Grade I (<25% slip), Grade II (25–50%), Grade III (50–75%), Grade IV (75–100%), Grade V (spondyloptosis = complete slip)
Surgical Management by Grade
| Grade | Management |
|---|---|
| Grade I–II (low grade) | Conservative treatment first; surgery (decompression + fusion) if symptomatic with refractory radiculopathy/claudication or progressive slip |
| Grade III–IV (high grade) | Surgical management recommended — decompression + instrumented fusion with possible reduction |
| Grade V (spondyloptosis) | Always surgical; reduction + fusion; high complication rate including L5 nerve root stretch injury |
💎 Board Pearl
- SPORT trial: for lumbar disc herniation, surgery provides faster recovery but long-term outcomes converge; for lumbar stenosis, surgery was superior at all time points
- Neurogenic vs. vascular claudication: neurogenic = relieved by sitting/flexion (shopping cart sign); vascular = relieved by simply standing still
- Isthmic spondylolisthesis = pars defect; most common at L5–S1; degenerative spondylolisthesis = facet arthropathy; most common at L4–L5
- High-grade spondylolisthesis (Grade III–V) is essentially always a surgical indication
- Microdiscectomy is the gold standard surgical treatment for lumbar disc herniation — 85–90% success rate for radiculopathy
Surgical Urgency Classification
Spine Surgery Urgency
| Urgency | Timeframe | Conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Emergent (<24 hours) | Immediate / within hours | Cauda equina syndrome; acute spinal cord compression with progressive deficit; epidural abscess with neurologic compromise; unstable spine fracture with cord compression |
| Urgent (24–72 hours) | Within 1–3 days | Metastatic cord compression with new deficit (Patchell criteria); progressive myelopathy; acute disc herniation with motor deficit (e.g., foot drop) |
| Semi-urgent (1–4 weeks) | Prompt scheduling | Progressive cervical myelopathy (moderate-severe mJOA); worsening spondylolisthesis with neurologic symptoms |
| Elective | Weeks to months | Refractory radiculopathy after conservative failure; neurogenic claudication failing conservative management; stable spondylolisthesis with chronic symptoms |
💎 Board Pearl
- Three absolute surgical emergencies in spine: cauda equina syndrome, acute cord compression with progressive deficit, and spinal epidural abscess with neurologic deficit, progression, instability, sepsis, or failure of medical therapy; carefully selected neurologically intact patients with identified organism may be treated medically with close monitoring
- Timing matters most in cauda equina syndrome — decompress within 24 hours; CES-Incomplete has a narrow window before converting to CES-Retention
- For metastatic cord compression, start dexamethasone 16 mg/day (oral or equivalent IV) promptly (NICE NG234) and arrange urgent surgical evaluation; if lymphoma is suspected, avoid steroids before tissue diagnosis unless urgent neurologic compromise mandates treatment
Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury & ASIA Classification
Initial Management
- ATLS principles: airway (with in-line cervical stabilization), breathing, circulation; cervical collar + full spine precautions until cleared
- Assess level and completeness of injury; document baseline ASIA exam early and serially
- Avoid hypotension (MAP goal often 85–90 mmHg × 5–7 days in many protocols) to preserve cord perfusion
ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS)
| Grade | Definition |
|---|---|
| A — Complete | No motor or sensory function preserved in the sacral segments S4–S5 |
| B — Sensory incomplete | Sensory but not motor function preserved below the neurological level, including sacral segments S4–S5 |
| C — Motor incomplete | Motor function preserved below the neurological level; more than half of key muscles below have a muscle grade <3 |
| D — Motor incomplete | Motor function preserved below the neurological level; more than half of key muscles below have a muscle grade ≥3 |
| E — Normal | Motor and sensory function normal; used for patients with prior deficits who recover fully |
Steroids in Acute Traumatic SCI
- Methylprednisolone is NOT recommended in acute traumatic SCI per AANS/CNS 2013 guidelines
- NASCIS I–III trials initially suggested benefit, but post-hoc subgroup analyses were methodologically flawed; subsequent reviews found no clear benefit and a harm signal (infection, GI bleeding, hyperglycemia, pneumonia)
- NASCIS controversy is considered resolved against routine steroid use
Timing of Decompression
- STASCIS trial (Fehlings 2012): prospective cohort of acute cervical SCI — decompression within 24 hours associated with significantly improved neurologic outcomes (≥2-grade AIS improvement at 6 months) compared to delayed surgery
- Earlier decompression is generally favored when patient is stable enough for surgery
💎 Board Pearl
- ASIA A = complete; sacral sparing (S4–S5) is the dividing line between complete and incomplete injury
- Methylprednisolone is NOT recommended in acute SCI (AANS/CNS 2013); NASCIS data does not support it and shows harm
- STASCIS: decompression within 24 hours improves outcomes in acute cervical SCI
High-Yield Spine Fractures & Craniovertebral-Junction Patterns
| Fracture | Mechanism / Location | Stability & Management |
|---|---|---|
| Jefferson fracture (C1 burst) | Axial load (diving, falling object); bilateral fracture of anterior & posterior C1 arches | Unstable if transverse atlantal ligament torn (rule of Spence: combined C1 lateral mass displacement >7 mm on open-mouth view). Halo or fusion if unstable |
| Odontoid Type I | Tip of dens (alar ligament avulsion) | Usually stable; collar |
| Odontoid Type II | Base of dens — most common odontoid fracture | Unstable; high non-union rate (especially >65 y); often surgical (anterior odontoid screw or posterior C1-C2 fusion) |
| Odontoid Type III | Extends into C2 body | Best healing prognosis; halo or rigid collar usually sufficient |
| Hangman fracture (traumatic spondylolisthesis of C2) | Hyperextension/distraction (judicial hanging, MVC dashboard); bilateral C2 pars/pedicle fracture ± anterior C2-on-C3 displacement | Levine-Edwards grade I usually halo; higher grades need surgical fusion |
| Chance fracture | Flexion-distraction at thoracolumbar junction through the body, pedicles & spinous process (“seat-belt sign”) | Unstable; assume concomitant intra-abdominal injury (~50%); surgical fixation |
| Burst fracture (T/L) | Axial compression with retropulsion of body fragments | Surgical if >50% canal compromise, >25° kyphosis, or neurologic deficit (TLICS ≥5) |
Atlantoaxial Instability — High-Risk Populations
- Down syndrome: ligamentous laxity at C1–C2; screen with flexion/extension lateral C-spine films before contact sports or elective intubation. Symptomatic instability requires surgical fusion.
- Rheumatoid arthritis: chronic synovitis erodes the transverse ligament → C1–C2 subluxation, retro-odontoid inflammatory pannus (T1 iso, T2 bright, enhances), basilar invagination with cervicomedullary compression. Pre-operative cervical MRI mandatory before general anesthesia in long-standing RA.
- Klippel-Feil, Morquio syndrome (MPS IV), os odontoideum, achondroplasia — other congenital causes of upper cervical instability.
💎 Board Pearl
- Odontoid II = most common, most unstable. Type III heals best.
- Chance fracture = lap-belt MVC + abdominal injury (mesenteric/duodenal); always image the abdomen.
- Down syndrome + neck pain or new myelopathic signs = C1–C2 instability until proven otherwise.
- RA + sudden quadriparesis or death → basilar invagination with pannus compressing the medulla.
Neurogenic Shock vs. Spinal Shock
| Neurogenic Shock | Spinal Shock | |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Hemodynamic disturbance — hypotension + bradycardia from disruption of descending sympathetic pathways | Transient loss of all reflexes/tone/function below the level of injury |
| Typical injury level | Cervical or upper thoracic SCI (above T6) | Any level of SCI |
| Clinical features | Hypotension, bradycardia (unopposed vagal tone), warm/dry skin (peripheral vasodilation) | Flaccid paralysis, areflexia, anesthesia, hypotonia, loss of bulbocavernosus reflex |
| Duration | Days to weeks | Days to weeks; resolution heralded by return of bulbocavernosus reflex (usually first reflex to return) |
| Treatment | IV fluids first; vasopressors (norepinephrine or phenylephrine) if persistent; atropine for symptomatic bradycardia; maintain MAP 85–90 mmHg | Supportive; treat the underlying SCI; no specific pharmacotherapy |
Clinical Pearl
- Spinal shock ends when the bulbocavernosus reflex returns — only then can a true ASIA exam classify complete vs. incomplete
- Neurogenic shock is hemodynamic (BP/HR); spinal shock is neurologic (reflexes/tone)
Incomplete Spinal Cord Syndromes
| Syndrome | Mechanism / Anatomy | Clinical Features |
|---|---|---|
| Central cord syndrome | Most common incomplete SCI; hyperextension injury in elderly with pre-existing cervical stenosis; central gray + medial corticospinal tract (hands) | Upper extremity weakness > lower extremity (“hands > legs”); variable sensory loss; sacral sparing; bladder dysfunction common |
| Anterior cord syndrome | Anterior spinal artery territory; flexion injury, vascular insult, or anterior compression; affects anterior 2/3 of cord | Bilateral motor loss (corticospinal) + loss of pain/temperature (spinothalamic) below level; dorsal columns (vibration/proprioception) spared; worst prognosis for recovery |
| Brown-Séquard syndrome | Hemicord injury — classically penetrating trauma; also tumor, MS plaque | Ipsilateral motor (corticospinal) and dorsal column (vibration/proprioception) loss below level; contralateral pain/temperature loss starting 1–2 levels below; best prognosis of incomplete syndromes |
| Posterior cord syndrome | Rare; posterior spinal artery infarct, B12 deficiency, tabes dorsalis, MS | Loss of vibration/proprioception (dorsal columns); preserved motor, pain, temperature; gait ataxia (sensory) |
💎 Board Pearl
- Central cord syndrome: elderly + hyperextension + hands > legs = classic stem; most common incomplete SCI; sacral sparing present
- Anterior cord syndrome: motor + spinothalamic out, dorsal columns intact; worst prognosis
- Brown-Séquard: ipsilateral motor/dorsal column + contralateral pain/temp; best prognosis
Conus Medullaris vs. Cauda Equina Syndromes
| Conus Medullaris Syndrome | Cauda Equina Syndrome | |
|---|---|---|
| Anatomy | S1–S5 + coccygeal segments of the spinal cord itself (ends ~L1–L2 in adults) | Lumbosacral nerve roots below the conus |
| Onset | Sudden, often bilateral | Gradual, often unilateral initially |
| Pain | Less prominent; bilateral if present | Severe radicular pain; often unilateral and asymmetric |
| Motor deficit | Symmetric; less prominent than CES | Asymmetric; motor-predominant; can be severe |
| Sensory | Symmetric saddle anesthesia (perianal) | Asymmetric saddle anesthesia possible |
| Bowel/bladder | Early bowel/bladder dysfunction (sacral cord) | May be spared early; develops as roots are progressively involved |
| Reflexes | Mixed UMN/LMN signs possible (cord involvement) | Pure LMN; areflexia in affected roots |
💎 Board Pearl
- Conus = sudden, symmetric, early bowel/bladder, less pain; cauda = gradual, asymmetric, severe radicular pain, bowel/bladder later
- Both are surgical emergencies when caused by reversible compression
Cervical Spine Clearance — NEXUS & Canadian C-Spine Rule
NEXUS Criteria
- The cervical spine can be clinically cleared without imaging if ALL of the following are present:
- No posterior midline cervical tenderness
- No focal neurologic deficit
- Normal level of alertness
- No evidence of intoxication
- No painful distracting injury
- High sensitivity for clinically significant cervical injury
Canadian C-Spine Rule
- Step 1 — High-risk factors requiring imaging: age ≥65, dangerous mechanism (e.g., fall from >3 ft / 5 stairs, axial load, high-speed MVC, motorized recreational vehicle, bicycle collision), or paresthesias in extremities
- Step 2 — Low-risk factors that allow safe assessment of range of motion: simple rear-end MVC, sitting in ED, ambulatory at any time, delayed onset of neck pain, no midline cervical tenderness
- Step 3 — Active rotation: if able to actively rotate the neck 45° bilaterally, no imaging required
- More specific than NEXUS in many studies; reduces imaging utilization in low-risk patients
💎 Board Pearl
- NEXUS: 5 criteria, all must be negative to clinically clear without imaging
- Canadian C-Spine Rule: any high-risk factor → image; otherwise check low-risk + ability to rotate 45°
Spinal Cord Tumors
Anatomic Classification
- Extradural: majority are metastatic (covered in MESCC section)
- Intradural-extramedullary (IDEM)
- Intramedullary (IM)
Intradural-Extramedullary (IDEM) Tumors
| Tumor | Features |
|---|---|
| Meningioma | Most common IDEM tumor in adults; female predominance; thoracic spine most common location; dural-based; usually benign (WHO grade 1); gross total resection curative in most cases |
| Schwannoma | Arises from Schwann cells of nerve root (typically sensory); “dumbbell” tumor through neural foramen; associated with NF2 (bilateral vestibular schwannomas + spinal schwannomas) |
| Neurofibroma | Associated with NF1; intermixed with nerve fibers (harder to resect without sacrificing root); plexiform variant can be locally aggressive |
Intramedullary (IM) Tumors
| Tumor | Features |
|---|---|
| Ependymoma | Most common adult IM tumor; central within cord; well-circumscribed with a resectable cleavage plane; myxopapillary variant classically at conus/filum terminale; gross total resection has excellent outcome |
| Astrocytoma | Most common pediatric IM tumor; infiltrative without clear cleavage plane; resection more limited; may need biopsy + radiation/chemo for higher grades |
| Hemangioblastoma | Highly vascular; associated with von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease (also retinal hemangioblastoma, RCC, pheochromocytoma, cerebellar hemangioblastoma); preoperative embolization sometimes used |
💎 Board Pearl
- Most common IDEM in adults = meningioma (thoracic, female)
- Most common adult IM = ependymoma (resectable cleavage plane); most common pediatric IM = astrocytoma (infiltrative)
- NF2 = bilateral vestibular schwannomas + spinal schwannomas; NF1 = neurofibromas; VHL = hemangioblastoma
- Myxopapillary ependymoma is the classic conus/filum tumor
Spinal Vascular Malformations
Spinal Dural Arteriovenous Fistula (sDAVF)
- Most common spinal vascular malformation; abnormal connection between a radicular artery and a radicular vein within the dural sleeve of a nerve root
- Demographics: elderly men predominantly
- Location: low thoracic / thoracolumbar most common
- Clinical: progressive myelopathy (gait dysfunction, weakness, bowel/bladder), often misdiagnosed initially; Foix-Alajouanine syndrome = subacute necrotizing myelopathy from chronic venous congestion
- MRI: central T2 cord hyperintensity (cord edema from venous hypertension) + serpentine flow voids on cord surface
- Diagnosis: spinal angiography to identify the fistula site
- Treatment: endovascular embolization or surgical clipping of the fistula; both can be definitive
Spinal AVM (Intramedullary)
- True nidus within the cord parenchyma; congenital lesion; typically presents in younger patients
- Can present with hemorrhage (subarachnoid or intramedullary) or progressive myelopathy
- Treatment is multimodal: embolization, microsurgery, and/or radiosurgery depending on anatomy
💎 Board Pearl
- sDAVF = elderly man + progressive myelopathy + low thoracic cord edema + flow voids on MRI; treat with embolization or surgical clipping
- Foix-Alajouanine syndrome is the subacute necrotizing myelopathy from a chronic sDAVF
Syringomyelia
- Definition: fluid-filled cavity (syrinx) within the spinal cord
- Causes:
- Chiari I malformation (most common cause overall) — tonsillar descent obstructs CSF flow at the foramen magnum
- Post-traumatic (often years after SCI)
- Post-infectious (arachnoiditis)
- Tumor-associated (intramedullary tumor with cyst)
- Idiopathic
- Clinical: classic “cape” (suspended) distribution of pain/temperature loss over shoulders/upper arms with preservation of light touch (dissociated sensory loss); motor preservation early; later wasting of intrinsic hand muscles, scoliosis (especially in children)
- Diagnosis: MRI demonstrates the syrinx and the underlying cause
- Treatment: address the underlying cause — suboccipital decompression for Chiari-associated syrinx; syringo-subarachnoid or syringo-pleural shunt if syrinx persists or in selected refractory cases
💎 Board Pearl
- Syrinx + cape distribution dissociated sensory loss = think Chiari I
- Treat the cause first (e.g., Chiari decompression); shunting reserved for persistent/refractory cases
Tethered Cord Syndrome & Spina Bifida
- Tethered cord syndrome: abnormal caudal fixation of the spinal cord, producing traction-related neurologic dysfunction
- Anatomic causes:
- Tight/thickened filum terminale
- Conus below the L2 level in adults (normally ends ~L1–L2)
- Intradural lipoma (lipomyelomeningocele)
- Dermal sinus tract
- Diastematomyelia (split cord)
- Post-surgical scarring (re-tethering after myelomeningocele repair)
- Spina bifida spectrum:
- Spina bifida occulta: bony defect only; often incidental; cutaneous markers (hair tuft, dimple, hemangioma) over the spine raise concern
- Meningocele: herniation of meninges without neural tissue
- Myelomeningocele: herniation of meninges + neural tissue; associated with Chiari II; closed within first 24–72 hours after birth (or prenatally per MOMS trial in selected cases)
- Clinical: progressive lower extremity weakness/sensory loss, bowel/bladder dysfunction, back/leg pain, foot deformity, scoliosis
- Treatment: surgical detethering — release of the filum and/or untethering of adherent structures
💎 Board Pearl
- Conus below L2 in an adult = tethered cord until proven otherwise
- Cutaneous midline lumbosacral stigmata (hair tuft, dimple, hemangioma, lipoma) warrant MRI to rule out occult dysraphism
Vertebral Compression Fractures — Vertebroplasty & Kyphoplasty
Background
- Most common in osteoporotic patients (postmenopausal women, chronic steroid use); also pathologic (metastasis, myeloma) and traumatic
- Acute fracture → midline back pain, often mechanical; can produce kyphotic deformity if multiple/severe
- Initial management: analgesia, bracing, treat underlying osteoporosis (bisphosphonates, denosumab, teriparatide); most heal conservatively over 6–8 weeks
Vertebral Augmentation Procedures
| Procedure | Description | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Vertebroplasty | Percutaneous injection of PMMA cement directly into the fractured vertebral body | No height restoration; higher risk of cement extravasation |
| Kyphoplasty | Balloon tamp inflated within vertebral body to create a cavity, then PMMA cement injected at lower pressure | Some height restoration; lower extravasation risk than vertebroplasty |
Evidence & Considerations
- Pain-relief evidence is mixed: early sham-controlled RCTs (Kallmes/Buchbinder 2009 NEJM) showed no benefit over sham; later trials (VAPOUR, VERTOS IV) suggest benefit in select patients with acute fractures and severe pain
- Most appropriate in patients with severe, refractory pain at a recent (<6–8 weeks) fracture and clear correlation between fracture level and symptoms
- Complications: cement extravasation (epidural, paravertebral, venous — pulmonary cement embolism), adjacent-level fractures (cement-stiffened segment increases load on adjacent vertebrae), infection, neurologic injury
💎 Board Pearl
- Kyphoplasty uses a balloon to create a cavity and partially restores height; vertebroplasty directly injects cement without height restoration
- Pain-relief evidence is modest; reserve augmentation for refractory pain from acute osteoporotic fractures after conservative trial
- Main complications: cement extravasation and adjacent-level fractures
Continue reading — sign in
The full note has more clinical pearls, tables, and board-focused tips. Free account, no fee.