Clinical Neuromuscular

EMG/NCS Patterns

EMG/NCS Patterns in Neuromuscular Disease

What Do You Need to Know?

  • Axonal vs demyelinating NCS: axonal → reduced amplitudes with preserved velocities; demyelinating → slowed velocities (<70% LLN), prolonged distal latencies, conduction block, temporal dispersion
  • Conduction block = acquired demyelination: >50% CMAP amplitude/area drop = definite conduction block (EFNS/PNS 2021); >30% drop = possible conduction block when combined with other demyelinating features; seen in CIDP, MMN, GBS — NOT in hereditary (CMT1)
  • Neurogenic vs myopathic MUAPs: neurogenic = large, long, polyphasic, reduced recruitment; myopathic = small, short, polyphasic, early recruitment
  • RNS patterns: MG = ≥10% decrement at 2–3 Hz (postsynaptic); LEMS = ≥60% increment at 20–50 Hz (AANEM current standard; historical threshold was 100%) (presynaptic); botulism = increment (less dramatic than LEMS)
  • SFEMG: most sensitive test for NMJ disorders (~95% for generalized MG; ~90% for ocular MG when clinically weak muscle tested); measures jitter and blocking — but NOT specific (abnormal in reinnervation too)
  • Fibrillations ≠ denervation exclusively: also seen in inflammatory myopathies, necrotizing myopathies, muscular dystrophies, acid maltase deficiency
  • Localization keys: paraspinal fibrillations → root; reduced SNAP → distal to DRG (plexus/nerve); normal SNAP + abnormal CMAP → motor neuron/root/NMJ/myopathy
  • Temperature trap: cold limb → artificially slowed velocities, prolonged latencies, and increased CMAP amplitude — always warm to ≥32°C before testing
🚩 Don’t Miss — Test-Day Priorities
  • Demyelinating NCS quartet: prolonged distal motor latencies + slowed CV (<70% LLN) + temporal dispersion + conduction block ± abnormal/absent F-waves — defines acquired demyelination (CIDP, GBS, MMN)
  • Axonal NCS: reduced CMAP/SNAP amplitudes with preserved (or only mildly slowed) CV; F-waves normal or absent if severe loss
  • Conduction block at non-entrapment sites: hallmark of MMN (pure motor, asymmetric) and CIDP/AIDP — NEVER seen in hereditary demyelinating neuropathies (CMT1A)
  • Uniform vs multifocal slowing: uniform/symmetric slowing → hereditary demyelinating (CMT1A); multifocal slowing with conduction block/temporal dispersion → acquired (CIDP)
  • RNS rules: decrement >10% at 3 Hz → MG (postsynaptic); increment >60% on brief 10-sec exercise or 50 Hz rep stim → LEMS (presynaptic); botulism = increment but less dramatic
  • SFEMG: increased jitter ± blocking is the MOST SENSITIVE test for NMJ disorders — but NOT specific (also abnormal in reinnervation)
  • Myotonic discharge waveform: “dive bomber” waxing-waning AMPLITUDE AND FREQUENCY → myotonia congenita, paramyotonia, DM1/DM2, hyperkalemic PP, Pompe, IBM
  • Temperature pitfall: cold limb increases CMAP amplitude AND prolongs latencies/slows CV — mimics demyelination; always warm to ≥32°C
  • Distal-only stim error: CMT1A may look axonal if you only stim distally — MUST stimulate proximally to unmask uniform slowing
  • Albuminocytologic dissociation: elevated CSF protein with normal WBC count → GBS and CIDP (supports demyelinating NCS pattern)
🔍 Buzzwords & Pathognomonic FindingsNCS patterns · EMG signal patterns · Disease associations
NCS patterns
  • Conduction block at non-entrapment siteMMN or CIDP/AIDP (acquired demyelination)
  • Temporal dispersion (CIDP > AIDP)acquired demyelinating neuropathy
  • Uniform symmetric slowing of CVCMT1A (hereditary demyelinating)
  • Multifocal slowing + conduction blockCIDP (acquired)
  • Reduced CMAP/SNAP amplitudes, preserved CVaxonal neuropathy
  • >60% increment on brief exercise / 50 Hz rep stimLEMS (presynaptic NMJ)
  • >10% decrement on 3 Hz rep stimMG (postsynaptic NMJ)
  • Increased jitter on single-fiber EMGNMJ disorder (most sensitive)
EMG signal patterns
  • Fibrillations + positive sharp wavesactive denervation (2–3 wk after axonal injury) OR active myopathy with membrane instability
  • Complex repetitive discharges (CRDs)chronic denervation, dystrophies
  • “Dive bomber” waxing-waning dischargesmyotonic discharges (DM1/DM2, myotonia congenita, paramyotonia, Pompe, IBM)
  • “Marching soldiers” continuous ripplingmyokymia (radiation plexopathy, MS, Isaacs/CASPR2, snake bite)
  • Continuous high-frequency motor unit firingneuromyotonia (Isaacs/CASPR2, hereditary)
  • Large, long-duration, polyphasic MUAPs + reduced recruitmentneurogenic (chronic reinnervation)
  • Small, short-duration, polyphasic MUAPs + early recruitmentmyopathic
  • Gigantic motor unitspost-polio, chronic ALS, Kennedy disease
Disease-specific signatures
  • Diffuse continuous fasciculations + neurogenic MUAPs in 3 regionsALS
  • Tongue fasciculations (uncommon — suggests pathologic)ALS, Kennedy disease
  • Benign fasciculationsregular, brief, NO other EMG findings, no weakness
  • Pure motor conduction block, asymmetric, upper limb predominantMMN (anti-GM1)
  • Albuminocytologic dissociation + demyelinating NCS >8 wkCIDP
  • Albuminocytologic dissociation + acute demyelinating NCS <4 wkAIDP (GBS)
  • Prolonged/absent F-wave with normal distal CVearly GBS (proximal demyelination)
  • Absent H-reflexS1 radiculopathy, polyneuropathy, GBS (early)
Nerve Conduction Study Basics

Motor NCS

  • Technique: stimulate peripheral nerve → record CMAP from muscle via surface electrodes
  • CMAP amplitude: reflects number of functioning motor axons (axonal integrity)
  • Distal latency: time from distal stimulation to CMAP onset; prolonged in distal demyelination
  • Conduction velocity: distance ÷ (proximal latency − distal latency); reflects myelination status
  • F-wave: late response from antidromic activation of anterior horn cells → orthodromic return; tests entire motor nerve length including proximal segments; only ~1–5% of motor neurons backfire per stimulus, explaining variable latency/amplitude

Sensory NCS

  • SNAP amplitude: reflects number of functioning sensory axons
  • Sensory conduction velocity: reflects sensory nerve myelination
  • Sensory NCS are normal in lesions proximal to DRG (radiculopathy, motor neuron disease)

Axonal vs Demyelinating Patterns

Parameter Axonal Demyelinating
CMAP amplitude Reduced (primary abnormality) Reduced late (secondary axonal loss) or preserved early
SNAP amplitude Reduced May be preserved early
Conduction velocity Normal or mildly slow (>70% LLN) Significantly slow (<70% LLN)
Distal latency Normal or mildly prolonged Prolonged (>130% ULN)
Conduction block Absent Present (acquired demyelination)
Temporal dispersion Absent Present
F-wave latency Normal or absent (severe axonal loss) Prolonged or absent

F-Waves & H-Reflex

Late Response Mechanism Clinical Use Key Points
F-wave Antidromic activation of anterior horn cell → orthodromic return; NOT a reflex (no synapse) Tests proximal nerve conduction; GBS, radiculopathy Variable shape and latency; prolonged or absent in early GBS (often first abnormality)
H-reflex Electrical equivalent of monosynaptic stretch reflex (Achilles reflex); elicited by submaximal tibial nerve stimulation, recorded from soleus/gastrocnemius; afferent Ia → S1 anterior horn → efferent motor S1 radiculopathy; early GBS; polyneuropathy Absent or prolonged H-reflex = S1 root or proximal sensory nerve involvement; one of first abnormalities in GBS
💎 Board Pearl
  • F-wave is NOT a reflex — it involves no synapse; it is a backfiring of the motor neuron; variable amplitude and latency with each stimulation
  • In early GBS, F-waves and H-reflexes may be the ONLY abnormalities before distal NCS become abnormal
  • Axonal neuropathy: amplitude drops proportionally to axon loss; velocity stays >70% LLN because surviving axons conduct normally
Conduction Block & Temporal Dispersion

Definitions

Finding Definition Significance
Conduction block >50% CMAP amplitude/area drop = definite conduction block (EFNS/PNS 2021); >30% drop = possible conduction block when combined with other demyelinating features Acquired demyelination — CIDP, MMN, GBS; motor deficit without atrophy (early)
Temporal dispersion >30% increase in CMAP duration between distal and proximal stimulation Differential slowing of individual nerve fibers; acquired demyelinating neuropathies
Pseudo-conduction block Up to 20% amplitude drop is normal across most segments; up to 25% across the elbow (ulnar) is acceptable Submaximal stimulation, phase cancellation, or normal anatomic variation — NOT true demyelination

Conduction Block — Disease Correlations

Disease Conduction Block? Key Feature
CIDP Yes — multifocal, motor and sensory nerves Nonuniform slowing; symmetric; responds to IVIg/PE/steroids
MMN Yes — motor nerves ONLY Sensory NCS normal in same distribution; anti-GM1 Ab in ~50%; NO response to steroids
GBS (AIDP) Yes — evolves over days to weeks Sural sparing pattern; prolonged F-waves early
CMT1 No — uniform slowing without block Hereditary = uniform slowing to <38 m/s in upper limb motor nerves (Harding-Thomas criterion for CMT1A); often <20 m/s in severe cases; NO conduction block (distinguishes from CIDP)
Focal compressive neuropathy Yes — at compression site only Carpal tunnel, ulnar at elbow, peroneal at fibular head
💎 Board Pearl
  • Conduction block = acquired demyelination — if you see conduction block, think CIDP, MMN, or GBS; NEVER CMT1 (hereditary = uniform slowing, no block)
  • MMN mimics ALS clinically (asymmetric LMN weakness) but EMG shows conduction block in motor nerves with normal sensory — MUST check before diagnosing ALS
  • Conduction block causes weakness without atrophy (axon is intact but signal cannot pass) — atrophy develops only if secondary axonal loss occurs
Needle EMG Findings

Insertional & Spontaneous Activity

Finding Sound / Appearance Significance
Normal insertional activity Brief burst of activity with needle movement Normal muscle; ceases when needle stops moving
Increased insertional activity Prolonged electrical activity after needle movement Early denervation, inflammatory myopathy, acute processes
Decreased insertional activity Little or no activity with needle movement Fibrosis, severe atrophy, fatty replacement (end-stage disease)

Spontaneous Activity

Discharge Type Description Associated Conditions
Fibrillation potentials Single muscle fiber discharges; regular firing; small amplitude (20–300 μV typical range) Denervation (2–3 weeks after injury), inflammatory myopathy, necrotizing myopathy, acid maltase deficiency
Positive sharp waves (PSWs) Initial sharp positive deflection; same significance as fibrillations Same as fibrillations — seen together; appear 2–3 weeks after denervation
Fasciculation potentials Whole motor unit discharge; irregular firing; visible twitch under skin ALS (most concerning), radiculopathy, benign fasciculations, thyrotoxicosis, anticholinesterase toxicity
Myotonic discharges Waxing/waning amplitude AND frequency; “dive bomber” sound DM1, DM2, myotonia congenita, paramyotonia congenita, acid maltase deficiency, hyperkalemic periodic paralysis
Complex repetitive discharges (CRDs) “Machine-like” repetitive discharge; abrupt onset/offset; uniform frequency Chronic denervation, chronic myopathy — nonspecific; polio, radiculopathy, muscular dystrophy
Myokymic discharges Grouped repetitive bursts; “marching soldiers” sound Radiation plexopathy (#1 association), GBS, MS (facial myokymia), timber rattlesnake envenomation
Neuromyotonic discharges Very high frequency (150–300 Hz); decrementing amplitude; “pinging” sound Isaacs syndrome (neuromyotonia), CASPR2/LGI1 antibodies, Morvan syndrome
🎯 Clinical Pearl
  • Myokymic discharges on EMG + history of radiation therapy = radiation plexopathy (not tumor recurrence); tumor recurrence typically shows fibrillations without myokymia
  • Myotonic discharges have the classic “dive bomber” sound — if you hear waxing AND waning of BOTH amplitude and frequency, it is myotonia regardless of the clinical picture

Motor Unit Action Potentials (MUAPs)

Parameter Neurogenic Myopathic
Amplitude Large (increased due to reinnervation) Small (fewer functioning muscle fibers per motor unit)
Duration Long Short
Phases Polyphasic (may be) Polyphasic (common)
Recruitment Reduced (fewer motor units → increased firing rate of remaining units) Early/rapid (all motor units fire but each generates less force)
Firing rate at recruitment Fast (>15–20 Hz before new unit recruited) Normal (<15 Hz); many units fire at low force levels
Interference pattern Reduced (discrete or single-unit pattern in severe cases) Full but at low force; “early recruitment”
Mechanism Loss of motor neurons → surviving neurons reinnervate orphaned fibers → larger motor units Loss of individual muscle fibers → smaller motor units with fewer fibers per unit
💎 Board Pearl
  • Reduced recruitment + large MUAPs = neurogenic; early recruitment + small MUAPs = myopathic — this is the single most important EMG distinction on boards
  • Polyphasic MUAPs are nonspecific — seen in BOTH neurogenic and myopathic processes; up to 25% in deltoid; up to 15% in most limb muscles is normal
  • In acute denervation (<3 weeks), MUAPs may appear normal because reinnervation has not yet occurred — fibrillations may be the only finding
Repetitive Nerve Stimulation (RNS)

Low-Frequency RNS (2–3 Hz)

  • Principle: repeated stimulation depletes presynaptic ACh quanta; if NMJ safety factor is reduced, EPP falls below threshold → CMAP decrement
  • Normal: no significant decrement (<10%)
  • Abnormal decrement: ≥10% between 1st and 4th/5th response (U-shaped pattern: biggest drop at 3rd–4th stimulus, then partial repair)
  • Most sensitive muscles: proximal — trapezius, deltoid, facial (nasalis); distal muscles less sensitive
  • Post-exercise facilitation: 10 seconds of maximal exercise → temporary improvement (brief exercise transiently increases presynaptic ACh release, partially repairing the decrement in MG); test immediately after exercise
  • Post-exercise exhaustion: worsened decrement at 2, 3, and 4 minutes after 1 minute of sustained maximal exercise

High-Frequency RNS (20–50 Hz)

  • Principle: rapid stimulation causes massive Ca2+ accumulation at presynaptic terminal → increased ACh release
  • LEMS: ≥60% increment in CMAP amplitude (AANEM current standard; historical threshold was 100%) — highly characteristic (diagnostic in appropriate clinical context)
  • Botulism: facilitation present (similar to LEMS) but typically less dramatic (>60% increment)
  • Note: high-frequency RNS is painful; can substitute brief maximal voluntary exercise (10 seconds) then recheck CMAP at rest

RNS Findings by NMJ Disorder

Feature MG LEMS Botulism
NMJ defect Postsynaptic (AChR) Presynaptic (VGCC) Presynaptic (SNARE)
Baseline CMAP Normal Low amplitude Low amplitude
Low-rate RNS (2–3 Hz) ≥10% decrement Decrement present Decrement may be present
High-rate RNS (20–50 Hz) No significant increment ≥60% increment (AANEM current standard; historical threshold was 100%) — highly characteristic Increment present (less dramatic)
Post-exercise facilitation Brief repair of decrement (seconds) Dramatic CMAP amplitude increase Moderate CMAP amplitude increase
Sensory NCS Normal Normal Normal
Needle EMG Usually normal; unstable MUAPs (moment-to-moment variation) Short-duration, low-amplitude MUAPs; may mimic myopathy Short-duration MUAPs; fibrillations (in severe cases)
💎 Board Pearl
  • LEMS triad on electrodiagnostics: (1) low baseline CMAP, (2) decrement on low-rate RNS, (3) ≥60% increment on high-rate RNS or post-exercise (AANEM current standard; historical threshold was 100%) — diagnostic in appropriate clinical context
  • In MG, RNS sensitivity is ~75% in generalized and ~30–50% in ocular MG — a normal RNS does NOT rule out MG (get SFEMG)
  • AChE inhibitors (pyridostigmine) should be held ≥12 hours before RNS to avoid masking decrement
Single Fiber EMG (SFEMG)

Principles & Technique

Feature Details
What it measures Jitter = variability in time interval between two single muscle fiber APs belonging to the same motor unit
Normal jitter Normal mean MCD varies by muscle and age — e.g., EDC ~34 μs upper limit in voluntary SFEMG; values must be referenced against age- and muscle-specific norms
Blocking Intermittent failure of one fiber to fire — indicates severe NMJ transmission failure
Sensitivity for MG ~95% for generalized MG; ~90% for ocular MG (when clinically weak muscle tested) — most sensitive test for NMJ disorders
Specificity Low — abnormal in ANY condition affecting NMJ transmission or fiber density
Stimulated SFEMG Easier, more reproducible, no need for patient cooperation; uses nerve stimulation instead of voluntary activation

Causes of Increased Jitter

Category Examples
NMJ disorders MG (most sensitive test), LEMS, botulism, congenital myasthenic syndromes
Neurogenic (reinnervation) ALS, radiculopathy, neuropathy — newly formed NMJs have immature, unstable transmission
Myopathic Inflammatory myopathy, some muscular dystrophies — muscle fiber splitting creates new NMJs
💎 Board Pearl
  • SFEMG is the MOST SENSITIVE test for MG (~95% for generalized MG; ~90% for ocular MG when clinically weak muscle tested) but NOT the most specific — increased jitter is also seen in reinnervation (ALS, neuropathy) and myopathies
  • A normal SFEMG in a clinically weak muscle essentially rules out MG in that muscle
  • Test a clinically affected muscle for highest yield; extensor digitorum communis is the most commonly tested muscle
Pattern Recognition — NCS/EMG by Disease

Master Reference Table

Disease Motor NCS Sensory NCS Needle EMG Key Finding
ALS Reduced CMAP; normal velocities Normal (hallmark) Widespread fibs/PSWs + fasciculations; large neurogenic MUAPs with reduced recruitment Diffuse denervation/reinnervation in ≥3 body regions (bulbar, cervical, thoracic, lumbosacral) with normal sensory
GBS (AIDP) Prolonged DL, prolonged/absent F-waves, conduction block, temporal dispersion, slowed CV Sural sparing pattern (normal sural, abnormal upper limb SNAPs) Fibrillations (late, 2–3 weeks); reduced recruitment early Sural sparing pattern; conduction block and temporal dispersion may be delayed (1–2 weeks); F-wave/H-reflex abnormalities are typically the earliest findings; evolves over days
CIDP Same as AIDP but chronic; nonuniform slowing; conduction block; prolonged DL/F-waves Reduced SNAPs Chronic denervation/reinnervation; CRDs in longstanding cases Nonuniform slowing differentiates from CMT1; conduction block present (unlike CMT1)
CMT1 Uniform slowing ALL nerves (<38 m/s in upper limb motor nerves [Harding-Thomas criterion for CMT1A]; often <20 m/s in severe cases); no conduction block Reduced or absent SNAPs Chronic neurogenic changes Uniform slowing + absent conduction block = hereditary; biopsy → onion bulbs
CMT2 Reduced CMAP amplitudes; normal/near-normal velocities Reduced SNAP amplitudes Chronic neurogenic changes Axonal pattern (reduced amplitudes, preserved velocities); distinguish from CMT1 by normal CV
MG Normal CMAP at rest Normal Usually normal; unstable MUAPs; SFEMG → increased jitter ≥10% decrement on low-rate RNS; SFEMG most sensitive (~95% generalized MG; ~90% ocular MG)
LEMS Low CMAP at rest; ≥60% increment on high-rate RNS or post-exercise (AANEM current standard; historical threshold was 100%) Normal Short-duration, low-amplitude MUAPs (can mimic myopathy) Low baseline CMAP + dramatic facilitation (≥60%) = highly characteristic (diagnostic in appropriate clinical context)
Myopathy (general) Normal (or mildly reduced CMAP in severe) Normal Small, short, polyphasic MUAPs; early recruitment; ± fibrillations (if inflammatory/necrotizing) Normal NCS + myopathic MUAPs; fibrillations suggest active/inflammatory process
Myotonic dystrophy Normal or mildly reduced CMAP Normal Myotonic discharges (“dive bomber”); myopathic MUAPs Myotonic discharges + myopathic MUAPs; DM1 > DM2 for EMG abnormalities
CIP (critical illness polyneuropathy) Reduced CMAP amplitudes Reduced SNAP amplitudes Fibrillations; neurogenic MUAPs Both CMAP AND SNAP reduced (axonal sensorimotor); ICU setting
CIM (critical illness myopathy) Reduced CMAP amplitudes Normal (key differentiator from CIP) Fibrillations; myopathic MUAPs; reduced CMAP on direct muscle stimulation Reduced CMAP + normal SNAP differentiates from CIP; direct muscle stimulation is confirmatory
MMN Conduction block in motor nerves Normal in same nerve distribution Neurogenic changes in affected muscles; fasciculations may be present Motor conduction block + normal sensory in same nerve = MMN (NOT ALS); anti-GM1 in ~50%
Radiculopathy Normal (or reduced CMAP if severe/chronic) Normal (lesion proximal to DRG) Fibrillations in myotomal distribution + paraspinals; neurogenic MUAPs in chronic Normal SNAP is KEY — lesion is at root level (proximal to DRG); paraspinal fibrillations localize to root
🎯 Clinical Pearl
  • CIP vs CIM: both present as ICU weakness with fibrillations; SNAP reduction differentiates (reduced in CIP, normal in CIM); direct muscle stimulation is low in CIM but normal in CIP
  • MMN vs ALS: both cause asymmetric LMN weakness and fasciculations; conduction block with normal sensory NCS in the same nerve = MMN; treat with IVIg (NOT steroids, which worsen MMN)
Localization Principles

Electrodiagnostic Localization Algorithm

Finding Localization Explanation
Paraspinal fibrillations Root level Paraspinal muscles innervated by posterior rami; NOT involved in plexus or peripheral nerve lesions
Reduced SNAP Lesion distal to DRG (plexus or nerve) DRG cell body is in the foramen; root avulsion leaves DRG intact → normal SNAP; plexus lesion damages axon distal to DRG → abnormal SNAP
Normal SNAP + abnormal CMAP Motor neuron, root, NMJ, or muscle Sensory axons unaffected (lesion proximal to DRG or affects only motor pathway)
Conduction block at specific site Focal nerve lesion at that site Carpal tunnel (median at wrist), cubital tunnel (ulnar at elbow), peroneal at fibular head
Diffuse slowing (<70% LLN) Demyelinating neuropathy Nonuniform = acquired (CIDP); uniform = hereditary (CMT1)
Normal NCS + abnormal SFEMG NMJ disorder MG, LEMS, congenital myasthenic syndromes
Myopathic MUAPs + normal NCS Myopathy Small short polyphasic MUAPs with early recruitment
Fibrillations in 2+ limbs across multiple root levels + fasciculations Motor neuron disease (ALS) Awaji — denervation evidence required in ≥2 regions combined with clinical UMN findings; ≥3 regions strengthens diagnostic certainty; SNAP must be normal

Root vs Plexus vs Nerve

Feature Root (Radiculopathy) Plexus (Plexopathy) Peripheral Nerve
SNAP Normal (lesion proximal to DRG) Reduced (lesion distal to DRG) Reduced (lesion distal to DRG)
CMAP Normal or reduced (if severe) Reduced Reduced
Paraspinal fibs Present Absent Absent
Distribution of EMG abnormalities Single myotome, multiple nerves Multiple nerves, multiple myotomes (trunk/cord pattern) Single nerve distribution
Conduction velocity Normal Normal or mildly slow Slow across lesion site
💎 Board Pearl
  • Normal SNAP = root level (the #1 electrodiagnostic rule for localization); reduced SNAP = plexus or peripheral nerve
  • Paraspinal fibrillations confirm root-level pathology — plexus and nerve lesions do NOT produce paraspinal findings
  • In preganglionic brachial plexus avulsion, SNAP is normal despite complete sensory loss clinically — because the DRG and its peripheral process are intact
  • For ALS diagnosis: widespread denervation/reinnervation across multiple myotomes + normal sensory NCS + fasciculations — Awaji criteria allow fasciculation potentials to serve as evidence of denervation
Common EMG Pitfalls & Board Traps

High-Yield Pitfalls Table

Pitfall What Happens Board-Relevant Point
Cold temperature Slowed velocities, prolonged distal latencies, increased CMAP amplitude, increased SNAP amplitude Can mimic demyelinating neuropathy; ALWAYS warm limb to ≥32°C before testing; most common technical error on boards
Martin-Gruber anastomosis Motor axons cross from median to ulnar nerve in forearm; median CMAP larger at elbow than wrist (initial positive deflection at wrist) Present in 15–30% of population; creates apparent conduction block or initial positive deflection; can confound carpal tunnel diagnosis
Submaximal stimulation Not all axons activated → artificially low CMAP amplitude Can falsely mimic conduction block; must use supramaximal stimulation (20% above maximal)
Wallerian degeneration timeline NCS changes delayed: motor axons → 3–5 days; sensory axons → 7–11 days EMG done <7 days after acute injury may appear normal; fibrillations take 2–3 weeks to appear; must wait for accurate assessment
Volume conduction Recording electrode picks up signal from nearby muscles, not the target Can produce initial positive deflection or unusually large CMAPs; verify proper electrode placement
Fibrillations in myopathy Fibrillations are NOT exclusive to denervation — seen in inflammatory, necrotizing, and some dystrophies Do NOT assume fibrillations = neurogenic; context matters — fibrillations + myopathic MUAPs = myopathy with active fiber necrosis
Sural sparing pattern Normal sural SNAP with abnormal median/ulnar SNAPs Classic for GBS (AIDP) — distal demyelination preferentially affects upper limb sensory nerves; highly specific for GBS in acute weakness setting
Inching (short-segment studies) Stimulation at 1–2 cm increments across suspected lesion site Precisely localizes focal conduction block or slowing; useful for ulnar neuropathy at elbow, carpal tunnel syndrome
Accessory peroneal nerve Anomalous innervation of EDB from behind lateral malleolus (branch of superficial peroneal) Ankle CMAP is smaller than below-fibular-head CMAP; stimulate behind lateral malleolus to identify; present in ~20% of population
Median-ulnar crossover (Riche-Cannieu) Ulnar motor fibers cross to median in the hand, innervating thenar muscles All hand muscles may be ulnar-innervated in extreme cases; affects interpretation of median motor studies
💎 Board Pearl
  • Temperature is the #1 technical pitfall: cold hand = slow velocities + high amplitudes = false demyelination; warm to ≥32°C (hand) / ≥34°C (leg)
  • Martin-Gruber anastomosis: if median CMAP at elbow is > CMAP at wrist, suspect anomalous crossover, not conduction block; stimulate ulnar at wrist to confirm
  • Sural sparing pattern: normal sural + abnormal upper limb SNAPs in acute weakness = GBS until proven otherwise
  • Timing matters: do NOT perform EMG/NCS <2 weeks after acute injury if looking for fibrillations; motor NCS can be done >5 days for axonal loss documentation
🔒

Continue reading — sign in

The full note has more clinical pearls, tables, and board-focused tips. Free account, no fee.