Clinical Vascular

Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Intracerebral Hemorrhage

What Do You Need to Know?

  • Hypertension is the #1 cause of spontaneous ICH; deep/infratentorial locations suggest hypertensive etiology, lobar locations suggest CAA, tumor, or vascular malformation
  • Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) diagnosis using the modified Boston criteria 2.0 — lobar microbleeds, cortical superficial siderosis, APOE associations
  • Acute blood pressure management: INTERACT2 (target <140 mmHg) vs. ATACH-2 (intensive lowering not superior, may cause renal harm)
  • Reversal of anticoagulation: warfarin → 4-factor PCC + vitamin K; dabigatran → idarucizumab; factor Xa inhibitors → andexanet alfa or 4F-PCC
  • ICH Score components and 30-day mortality prediction; awareness of self-fulfilling prophecy / early care limitation bias
  • CTA spot sign predicts hematoma expansion; hematoma expansion occurs in ~30% within first hours and is the strongest modifiable predictor of poor outcome
  • Surgical trials: STICH/STICH II (no general benefit for supratentorial ICH), MISTIE III, cerebellar ICH >3 cm → surgical evacuation
  • CLEAR III trial for intraventricular hemorrhage; EVD management for obstructive hydrocephalus
Epidemiology & Risk Factors

Epidemiology

  • ICH accounts for 10–15% of all strokes but carries the highest mortality (~40% at 30 days)
  • Incidence: ~25 per 100,000 person-years in the U.S.; higher in Asian and Black populations
  • Median age of onset: 60–70 years
  • ICH is the most common type of hemorrhagic stroke (more common than SAH)
  • Only ~20% of ICH patients are functionally independent at 6 months

Risk Factors

Modifiable

  • Hypertension — #1 risk factor overall (accounts for 60–70% of spontaneous ICH); chronic HTN → lipohyalinosis of small penetrating arteries
  • Anticoagulation: Warfarin-associated ICH carries ~50% mortality; DOACs have lower ICH risk than warfarin
  • Antiplatelet agents: Modestly increase ICH risk, especially dual antiplatelet therapy
  • Heavy alcohol use: >2 drinks/day increases ICH risk 2–4 fold
  • Cocaine / amphetamines / sympathomimetics: Acute hypertensive surge → ICH; often in younger patients; consider in any young patient with ICH
  • Smoking: Independent risk factor; synergistic with HTN

Non-Modifiable / Structural

  • Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA): Leading cause of lobar ICH in elderly; recurrent lobar hemorrhages
  • Vascular malformations: AVMs, cavernous malformations, dural AVFs — especially in young patients with lobar ICH
  • Brain tumors: Primary (GBM, oligodendroglioma) and metastatic (melanoma, RCC, choriocarcinoma, thyroid) — hemorrhagic metastases
  • Coagulopathies: Thrombocytopenia, DIC, hemophilia, liver disease
  • Cerebral venous thrombosis: Venous infarction with secondary hemorrhagic conversion — often bilateral, near sinuses
  • Moyamoya disease: ICH from fragile collateral vessels in young Asian patients
  • Vasculitis / mycotic aneurysm: Infective endocarditis → septic emboli → mycotic aneurysm rupture
💎 Board Pearl

Hemorrhagic brain metastases — “MR CT” mnemonic: Melanoma, Renal cell carcinoma, Choriocarcinoma, Thyroid. These tumors have a high propensity to bleed. Any lobar ICH in a patient with known cancer should raise suspicion for hemorrhagic metastasis.

Pathophysiology

Hypertensive ICH Mechanism

  • Chronic hypertensionlipohyalinosis (fibrinoid necrosis) of small perforating arteries (lenticulostriates, thalamoperforators, pontine perforators)
  • Lipohyalinosis → weakening of vessel wall → formation of Charcot-Bouchard microaneurysms
  • Acute BP surge or sustained HTN → rupture of microaneurysms → parenchymal hemorrhage
  • Typical locations: putamen (35–50%), thalamus (10–15%), cerebellum (5–10%), pons (5–10%), caudate (5–7%)
  • The same small vessel disease causes lacunar infarcts — ICH and lacunar strokes share a common vascular pathology

Hematoma Expansion

  • Occurs in ~30–38% of patients within the first 3–6 hours (most within 1–3 hours)
  • Defined as >33% increase in volume or >6 mL absolute growth from baseline CT
  • Strongest modifiable predictor of early neurological deterioration and death
  • Risk factors for expansion: early presentation (<3h from onset), anticoagulation, large initial volume, irregular hematoma shape, CTA “spot sign”
  • Mechanism: ongoing bleeding from ruptured arteriole + secondary mechanical disruption of surrounding vessels (“avalanche model”)

Perihematomal Edema

  • Surrounds the hematoma; peaks at ~10–14 days
  • Mechanisms: clot retraction, thrombin-mediated inflammation, red blood cell lysis → iron and hemoglobin toxicity
  • Contributes to secondary brain injury, mass effect, and clinical deterioration
  • Target of emerging therapies (e.g., deferoxamine for iron chelation — i-DEF trial)
🧪 The “Avalanche Model” of Hematoma Expansion
  • Initial arterial rupture → hematoma forms → mechanical shearing of adjacent small vessels at the hematoma margin → additional bleeding
  • This cascade explains why early aggressive BP lowering may limit expansion
  • The first 1–3 hours are the critical window for intervention to prevent growth
Location-Based Etiology
Location Frequency Most Likely Etiology Key Perforating Artery
Putamen 35–50% Hypertension Lateral lenticulostriates (MCA)
Thalamus 10–15% Hypertension Thalamogeniculate & thalamoperforating (PCA)
Lobar (cortical/subcortical) 20–30% CAA, tumor, AVM, anticoagulation Cortical / leptomeningeal branches
Cerebellum 5–10% Hypertension SCA, PICA, AICA perforators
Pons 5–10% Hypertension Basilar paramedian perforators
Caudate 5–7% Hypertension Recurrent artery of Heubner / lenticulostriates
  • Rule of thumb: Deep/infratentorial ICH = hypertensive etiology until proven otherwise
  • Lobar ICH in elderly (>55) without HTN: Think CAA first
  • Lobar ICH in young patient: Think AVM, cavernous malformation, tumor, drug use, venous thrombosis
  • Any atypical location or age: Pursue further workup — CTA, MRI with GRE/SWI, catheter angiography if needed
💎 Board Pearl

Putamen = most common site of hypertensive ICH (lenticulostriate rupture). Lobar = think CAA in elderly (especially recurrent lobar hemorrhages with cortical superficial siderosis). Deep/infratentorial = hypertensive. Lobar = non-hypertensive etiologies must be excluded.

Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy (CAA)

Overview

  • Deposition of amyloid-beta (Aβ) protein in the walls of small- to medium-sized cortical and leptomeningeal vessels
  • Causes progressive vessel wall weakening → recurrent lobar hemorrhages
  • Prevalence increases with age: found in ~50% of autopsies in patients >80 years
  • Most cases are sporadic; rare hereditary forms (Dutch, Flemish, Iowa, Italian types with APP mutations)
  • NOT the same as Alzheimer disease, but shares amyloid pathology; ~80% of AD patients have concurrent CAA

APOE Associations

  • APOE ε2: Associated with CAA-related vasculopathy (vessel wall cracking/splitting) → increased risk of ICH and hematoma expansion
  • APOE ε4: Associated with increased amyloid deposition in vessel walls → more microbleeds and recurrent lobar ICH
  • APOE ε4 also the major genetic risk factor for Alzheimer disease
  • APOE ε2/ε4 genotype carries the highest CAA-related ICH risk

Modified Boston Criteria 2.0 (2022)

Probable CAA

  • Age ≥50 years
  • At least 2 of the following hemorrhagic markers on MRI (strictly lobar distribution):
    • Lobar ICH (including in cerebellar cortex)
    • Lobar cerebral microbleeds (on GRE/SWI)
    • Cortical superficial siderosis (cSS) — focal or disseminated
  • OR: 1 hemorrhagic marker + 1 non-hemorrhagic marker (white matter hyperintensities in a multispot pattern, perivascular spaces in centrum semiovale >20)
  • Absence of other cause of hemorrhage

Possible CAA

  • Age ≥50 years
  • 1 hemorrhagic marker (single lobar ICH, lobar microbleeds, or cSS) in a strictly lobar location
  • Absence of other cause

Definite CAA

  • Full postmortem examination demonstrating lobar ICH + severe CAA with vasculopathy on histopathology
  • Congo red staining: Apple-green birefringence under polarized light = amyloid

Key Imaging Features

  • Lobar microbleeds (GRE/SWI) — strictly cortical/subcortical; spare deep structures (deep microbleeds suggest hypertensive small vessel disease)
  • Cortical superficial siderosis (cSS): Hemosiderin lining the cortical surface; seen as curvilinear hypointensity on GRE/SWI; disseminated cSS = high risk of future ICH
  • Convexity subarachnoid hemorrhage: Non-aneurysmal SAH localized to cortical sulci (NOT basal cisterns) — CAA is the most common cause in the elderly
  • White matter hyperintensities: Posterior-predominant in CAA (vs. periventricular in hypertensive SVD)
  • Enlarged perivascular spaces in centrum semiovale (characteristic of CAA)

CAA-Related Inflammation (CAA-ri)

  • Autoimmune/inflammatory response to amyloid in vessel walls
  • Presentation: Subacute cognitive decline, seizures, headache, focal deficits
  • MRI: Asymmetric white matter hyperintensities (often patchy, extending to subcortex) + lobar microbleeds + leptomeningeal enhancement
  • Key distinction: Resembles vasculitis or tumor but responds dramatically to immunosuppression (corticosteroids)
  • CSF may show elevated protein and anti-Aβ antibodies
  • Biopsy (if performed): Perivascular inflammation with granulomatous or lymphocytic infiltration
💎 Board Pearl

CAA board essentials: Strictly lobar microbleeds + cortical superficial siderosis + age ≥50 = probable CAA (Boston 2.0). Deep microbleeds = hypertensive, NOT CAA. APOE ε4 = more amyloid deposition; APOE ε2 = more vasculopathy/ICH risk. CAA-ri presents with subacute cognitive decline + asymmetric WMH + microbleeds and responds to steroids. Convexity SAH in the elderly = think CAA.

Clinical Presentation by Location

Putaminal Hemorrhage

  • Most common location for hypertensive ICH (35–50%)
  • Artery: lateral lenticulostriates (from MCA M1)
  • Presentation: Contralateral hemiparesis (face/arm/leg), hemisensory loss, homonymous hemianopia
  • Dominant hemisphere: Global aphasia (if large); may mimic MCA stroke
  • Nondominant hemisphere: Hemispatial neglect, anosognosia
  • Eyes deviate TOWARD the lesion (away from the hemiparesis) — same as cortical stroke; opposite of pontine hemorrhage
  • Extension into internal capsule → dense hemiplegia
  • Extension into ventricles → IVH → hydrocephalus

Thalamic Hemorrhage

  • Second most common hypertensive ICH location (10–15%)
  • Artery: thalamogeniculate and thalamoperforating arteries (from PCA)
  • Presentation: Contralateral hemisensory loss (often predominant), contralateral hemiparesis (if extends to internal capsule)
  • Classic eye findings:
    • Eyes deviate downward and inward (“peering at the nose”) — due to compression/damage of dorsal midbrain (upgaze center)
    • Wrong-way eyes: Eyes deviate AWAY from the lesion (toward the hemiparesis) — distinguishes from putaminal hemorrhage
    • Miotic (small) pupils that are poorly reactive
  • Dominant thalamic hemorrhage: Transcortical aphasia (especially with pulvinar involvement)
  • Frequently ruptures into the third ventricle → obstructive hydrocephalus (common reason for EVD)
  • Late complication: Dejerine-Roussy syndrome — central thalamic pain with allodynia and hyperpathia

Cerebellar Hemorrhage

  • 5–10% of ICH; usually from SCA or PICA perforators
  • Presentation: Sudden occipital headache, vomiting, truncal ataxia (unable to sit/stand), vertigo, dysarthria
  • NO limb weakness initially (distinguishes from supratentorial ICH)
  • Danger: Posterior fossa is a confined space → rapid brainstem compression:
    • Progressive obtundation → coma
    • Ipsilateral CN VI and VII palsies
    • Obstructive hydrocephalus (compression of fourth ventricle)
  • Surgical emergency if >3 cm or evidence of brainstem compression or hydrocephalus — suboccipital decompressive craniectomy + clot evacuation
  • One of the few ICH locations where surgery is clearly life-saving

Pontine Hemorrhage

  • 5–10% of ICH; basilar paramedian perforators
  • Presentation (massive): Coma, quadriplegia, decerebrate posturing, loss of all brainstem reflexes, hyperthermia
  • “Pinpoint pupils” (bilateral miotic but reactive — sympathetic disruption with intact parasympathetics)
  • Ocular bobbing: Rapid downward conjugate eye movements with slow return — characteristic of pontine lesion
  • Eyes midline and cannot cross midline (loss of horizontal gaze from bilateral PPRF/CN VI destruction)
  • Small lateral pontine hemorrhage may present as ataxic hemiparesis or dysarthria-clumsy hand
  • Prognosis: Massive pontine hemorrhage carries >80% mortality; very poor surgical candidacy

Lobar Hemorrhage

  • 20–30% of ICH; cortical / subcortical white matter
  • Etiologies: CAA (elderly), AVM (young), tumor, anticoagulation, occasionally hypertensive
  • Presentation varies by lobe:
    • Frontal: Contralateral hemiparesis, abulia, headache
    • Parietal: Contralateral hemisensory loss, hemineglect (nondominant)
    • Temporal: Wernicke-type aphasia (dominant), agitation, superior quadrantanopia
    • Occipital: Contralateral homonymous hemianopia, headache
  • Seizures more common with lobar ICH than deep ICH (~15–28% incidence)
  • Higher tendency for IVH extension if near ventricular system

Caudate Hemorrhage

  • 5–7% of ICH; recurrent artery of Heubner or lenticulostriates
  • Presentation: Headache, confusion, memory impairment, abulia (behavioral changes predominate over motor deficits)
  • Frequently ruptures into lateral ventricle due to proximity → IVH → hydrocephalus
  • May mimic SAH clinically (sudden headache, stiff neck from IVH-related meningism)
🧪 Eye Signs in ICH Localization
  • Putaminal: Eyes deviate TOWARD the lesion (same as cortical stroke)
  • Thalamic: Eyes deviate AWAY from lesion (“wrong-way eyes”) + downward gaze preference + small pupils
  • Pontine: Pinpoint pupils + ocular bobbing + loss of horizontal gaze
  • Cerebellar: Ipsilateral gaze palsy (CN VI), skew deviation, nystagmus
  • Eye findings are among the most commonly tested differentiators on boards
ICH Score & Prognosis

ICH Score (Hemphill, 2001)

  • Most widely used prognostic grading scale for ICH
  • Predicts 30-day mortality
  • Components (total 0–6 points):
Component Criteria Points
GCS3–42
5–121
13–150
ICH volume≥30 mL1
<30 mL0
IVH presentYes1
No0
Infratentorial originYes1
No0
Age≥801
<800

ICH Score & 30-Day Mortality

ICH Score 30-Day Mortality (%)
00%
113%
226%
372%
497%
5–6~100%

FUNC Score (Rost, 2008)

  • Predicts functional independence at 90 days (more useful than mortality prediction for patient/family counseling)
  • Components: ICH volume, age, ICH location, GCS, pre-ICH cognitive impairment
  • Score range 0–11; higher score = better functional prognosis
  • FUNC score ≤4 → virtually no chance of functional independence

Self-Fulfilling Prophecy & Early Care Limitation Bias

  • Critical concept: Early withdrawal of care or do-not-resuscitate orders based on initial prognostic scores may cause the predicted mortality rather than predict it
  • Studies show that early DNR orders within 24h are independently associated with mortality after adjusting for severity
  • AHA guidelines recommend: Full aggressive care for at least the first 24–48 hours; defer major goals-of-care decisions until trajectory is established
  • Prognostic scores (ICH score, FUNC) were derived from populations with high rates of early care limitations — may overestimate mortality in aggressively treated patients
💎 Board Pearl

ICH Score: GCS (0–2) + Volume ≥30 mL (1) + IVH (1) + Infratentorial (1) + Age ≥80 (1) = 0–6. Score of 0 = 0% mortality; 4 = 97% mortality. But beware the self-fulfilling prophecy: early withdrawal of care inflates mortality data. AHA recommends aggressive care for at least 24–48 hours before major prognostic decisions.

Acute Management

Initial Stabilization

  • ABCs: Secure airway if GCS ≤8 or unable to protect airway; intubation with rapid sequence induction
  • Stat NCCT head — differentiate ICH from ischemic stroke (ICH = hyperdense on CT)
  • CTA: Assess for spot sign (active contrast extravasation), vascular malformation, or aneurysm
  • Establish IV access, continuous monitoring, ICU admission
  • Labs: CBC, BMP, coagulation studies (PT/INR, aPTT), fibrinogen, type and screen, toxicology screen in young patients
  • Reverse any anticoagulation immediately (see below)

Blood Pressure Management

Key Trials

  • INTERACT2 (2013):
    • Intensive BP lowering (<140 mmHg systolic within 1 hour) vs. guideline-recommended (<180 mmHg)
    • Primary outcome (death or major disability): No significant difference by ordinal analysis; however, shift analysis showed improved functional outcomes with intensive lowering
    • Intensive lowering appeared safe with no increase in adverse events
    • Basis for AHA guideline recommendation of SBP <140 mmHg target
  • ATACH-2 (2016):
    • Intensive (<140 mmHg within 2 hours) vs. standard (<180 mmHg) using IV nicardipine
    • No benefit from intensive BP lowering; primary outcome (death or disability at 3 months) was similar
    • Increased renal adverse events in the intensive group (9% vs. 4%)
    • Possible explanation: achieved SBP was ~129 in intensive arm (too aggressive?) vs. ~141 in standard arm

Current AHA/ASA Guidelines (2022)

  • SBP 150–220 mmHg: Acute lowering to <140 mmHg is safe (Class IIa, Level B-R)
  • SBP >220 mmHg: Consider aggressive reduction with continuous IV infusion and frequent monitoring (Class IIb)
  • Avoid SBP drops below 130 mmHg — ATACH-2 suggested potential harm with over-aggressive lowering
  • Agents of choice:
    • Nicardipine: 5 mg/hr IV, titrate by 2.5 mg/hr q5–15 min (max 15 mg/hr) — preferred for precise titration
    • Labetalol: 10–20 mg IV bolus q10–20 min (max 300 mg); avoid in asthma, bradycardia, heart block
    • Clevidipine: 1–2 mg/hr IV, titrate rapidly; ultra-short half-life
  • Avoid nitroprusside (raises ICP) and sublingual nifedipine (unpredictable drops)
💎 Board Pearl

INTERACT2 supports SBP <140 (safe, possibly beneficial). ATACH-2 found no benefit and possible renal harm with overly aggressive lowering (SBP ~129). Practical target: SBP 130–140 mmHg. Use nicardipine for precise titration. Avoid dropping below 130 mmHg.

Reversal of Anticoagulation

Anticoagulant Reversal Agent Key Details
Warfarin 4-factor PCC (Kcentra) + IV Vitamin K 10 mg 4F-PCC is preferred over FFP (faster, more reliable INR correction, lower volume). PCC dose based on INR. Give vitamin K simultaneously (PCC wears off in 6–24h, vitamin K sustains correction). Target INR <1.3
Dabigatran (direct thrombin inhibitor) Idarucizumab (Praxbind) 5 g IV Monoclonal antibody fragment; binds dabigatran with 350x higher affinity than thrombin. Immediate and complete reversal within minutes. RE-VERSE AD trial. If unavailable, consider 4F-PCC or activated PCC (FEIBA)
Rivaroxaban / Apixaban (factor Xa inhibitors) Andexanet alfa (Andexxa) or 4F-PCC Andexanet alfa = recombinant modified factor Xa decoy; ANNEXA-4 trial showed effective anti-Xa reduction. High cost, thrombosis risk (~10%). 4F-PCC (50 units/kg) is a reasonable alternative and more widely available
Unfractionated heparin Protamine sulfate 1 mg protamine per 100 units heparin given in last 2–3 hours (max 50 mg). Caution: anaphylaxis risk (especially in NPH insulin users, fish allergy)
LMWH (enoxaparin) Protamine sulfate Only ~60% effective for LMWH reversal (does not fully reverse anti-Xa activity). 1 mg per 1 mg enoxaparin if within 8 hours
Antiplatelet agents Platelet transfusion — controversial PATCH trial (2016) showed platelet transfusion was associated with WORSE outcomes in antiplatelet-associated ICH. NOT routinely recommended. Consider only before neurosurgery
🧪 Warfarin Reversal: PCC vs. FFP
  • 4-factor PCC advantages: Faster INR correction (15–30 min vs. hours), smaller volume (<100 mL vs. 800–1600 mL), no ABO typing needed, no thawing required
  • FFP disadvantages: Slow (requires thawing + infusion), volume overload risk, risk of TRALI, incomplete correction
  • Always give vitamin K 10 mg IV simultaneously — PCC effect is temporary (hours), while vitamin K takes 6–12 hours for full effect but provides sustained reversal
  • FFP is now second-line per AHA/ASA guidelines when PCC is unavailable

Seizure Management

  • Clinical seizures occur in 5–16% of ICH patients (higher with lobar location)
  • Subclinical/electrographic seizures may occur in up to 28–31% on continuous EEG monitoring
  • AHA guidelines: Prophylactic antiepileptic drugs are NOT recommended (no proven benefit; potential harm from side effects)
  • Treat clinical seizures when they occur with standard AEDs (levetiracetam preferred — no drug interactions, IV formulation)
  • Continuous EEG monitoring recommended for patients with depressed mental status out of proportion to the degree of brain injury
  • Avoid phenytoin — associated with worse outcomes in some ICH studies

ICP Management

  • Indications: GCS ≤8, clinical signs of herniation, large ICH with significant mass effect, hydrocephalus
  • General measures: Head of bed 30°, midline head position, avoid jugular vein compression, pain/agitation control, avoid hyperthermia
  • Osmotherapy:
    • Mannitol 20%: 1–1.5 g/kg IV bolus; follow serum osmolality (hold if >320 mOsm/L); watch for rebound edema
    • Hypertonic saline (23.4%, 3%): 30 mL bolus of 23.4% via central line, or 250 mL of 3% NaCl; target Na 145–155 mEq/L; no osmol gap concern
  • EVD: For IVH with hydrocephalus or ICP monitoring (target ICP <20 mmHg, CPP >60 mmHg)
  • Hyperventilation: Temporary bridge only (target pCO2 30–35 mmHg); causes vasoconstriction → reduced CBF; rebound increase in ICP when discontinued

Other Acute Care Measures

  • Glucose: Target 140–180 mg/dL; avoid hyperglycemia (worsens edema/outcomes) and hypoglycemia
  • Temperature: Target normothermia; treat fever aggressively (acetaminophen, cooling blankets); fever is independently associated with worse outcomes
  • DVT prophylaxis:
    • Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC): Start on admission
    • Pharmacologic prophylaxis: Low-dose subcutaneous UFH or LMWH can be started at 24–48 hours after hemorrhage stabilization (AHA Class IIb) — ICH patients are at very high DVT/PE risk
  • Stress ulcer prophylaxis: Consider PPI or H2-blocker in ICU patients
  • Nutrition: Early enteral nutrition preferred; dysphagia screening mandatory
CTA Spot Sign & Hematoma Expansion

CTA Spot Sign

  • Definition: One or more foci of active contrast extravasation within the hematoma on CTA source images
  • Appears as 1–2 mm enhancing foci (density ≥120 HU) within the hematoma, discontinuous from normal vasculature
  • Sensitivity ~50–60%, specificity ~85–90% for predicting hematoma expansion
  • Number and size of spot signs correlate with expansion risk and mortality
  • Best detected on CTA source images or delayed-phase CTA (1–3 minutes post-injection)

Predicting & Preventing Hematoma Expansion

  • Predictors of expansion:
    • CTA spot sign (strongest imaging predictor)
    • Early presentation (<3 hours from onset)
    • Anticoagulant use
    • Large initial hematoma volume
    • Irregular / heterogeneous hematoma shape (“blend sign,” “swirl sign,” “black hole sign” on NCCT)
  • Strategies to prevent expansion:
    • Aggressive BP lowering (INTERACT2 target <140 mmHg)
    • Rapid anticoagulation reversal
    • Tranexamic acid — TICH-2 trial (2018): Reduced hematoma expansion at 24h but no improvement in 90-day functional outcome
    • Recombinant factor VIIa — FAST trial: Reduced expansion but increased thromboembolic events with no clinical benefit; NOT recommended
💎 Board Pearl

CTA spot sign = active contrast extravasation within hematoma = predicts expansion. Hematoma expansion (~30% of patients, first 1–3 hours) is the strongest modifiable predictor of poor outcome. Recombinant factor VIIa reduced expansion but increased thrombosis — NOT recommended. Tranexamic acid (TICH-2) reduced expansion but no functional benefit.

Surgical Management

Supratentorial ICH — Key Trials

STICH (2005)

  • Design: Early surgical evacuation (within 24h) vs. initial conservative treatment for supratentorial ICH
  • Result: No overall benefit of early surgery; trend toward benefit in lobar (superficial) hemorrhages <1 cm from cortical surface
  • Deep hemorrhages did NOT benefit from surgery

STICH II (2013)

  • Design: Specifically tested early surgery for lobar ICH (within 1 cm of cortical surface, 10–100 mL volume) without IVH
  • Result: No statistically significant benefit of early surgery over conservative management
  • However, 21% of the conservative group crossed over to surgery, diluting the effect
  • Interpretation: Early surgery may benefit patients who deteriorate, but routine early surgery for all lobar ICH is NOT supported

MISTIE III (2019)

  • Design: Minimally invasive surgery with stereotactic catheter placement + alteplase irrigation (to dissolve and drain clot) vs. standard medical care for ICH ≥30 mL
  • Result: Did NOT meet primary endpoint (mRS 0–3 at 365 days)
  • Key finding: Patients whose hematoma was reduced to <15 mL had significantly better outcomes → suggests surgical volume reduction may matter if sufficient clot removal is achieved

ENRICH (2024)

  • Design: Early minimally invasive parafascicular surgery (using BrainPath device) + medical care vs. medical care alone for lobar ICH ≥30 mL
  • Result: Met primary endpoint — improved utility-weighted mRS at 180 days with surgery
  • First RCT to show benefit of surgical evacuation for supratentorial ICH
  • Mainly in lobar ICH; confirms that technique and patient selection matter

Cerebellar Hemorrhage — Surgical Indications

  • Surgical evacuation (suboccipital craniectomy) is indicated for:
    • Hematoma >3 cm in diameter
    • Neurological deterioration (declining GCS)
    • Brainstem compression (absent brainstem reflexes, new cranial nerve palsies)
    • Obstructive hydrocephalus from fourth ventricle compression
  • Class I recommendation per AHA/ASA guidelines
  • EVD alone may be insufficient — does not address mass effect from the hematoma itself; clot evacuation should be performed
  • Patients can have excellent outcomes if surgery is performed before irreversible brainstem damage

EVD for IVH with Hydrocephalus

  • Indications: IVH causing obstructive hydrocephalus with acute neurological decline or GCS ≤8
  • Usually placed in the frontal horn of the lateral ventricle (Kocher’s point)
  • Monitor ICP (target <20 mmHg, CPP >60 mmHg)
  • Risk of ventriculitis with prolonged EVD (~5–10%)

Decompressive Craniectomy

  • May be considered for large supratentorial ICH with refractory elevated ICP as a life-saving measure
  • Limited evidence; SWITCH trial is evaluating this approach
  • May reduce mortality but potentially at the cost of survival with severe disability — requires goals-of-care discussion
💎 Board Pearl

STICH/STICH II: No routine benefit of early surgery for supratentorial ICH. MISTIE III: reduction to <15 mL improved outcomes but trial was overall negative. ENRICH: first positive trial for MIS in lobar ICH ≥30 mL. Cerebellar ICH >3 cm with brainstem compression or hydrocephalus = surgical evacuation (Class I). This is one of the most clear-cut surgical indications in all of neurology.

Intraventricular Hemorrhage & Hydrocephalus

IVH Overview

  • IVH occurs in ~45% of ICH patients (secondary extension from parenchymal hemorrhage)
  • Independent predictor of poor outcome — included in the ICH Score
  • Mechanisms of harm: obstructive hydrocephalus, direct ependymal injury, inflammation, impaired CSF absorption
  • Thalamic and caudate hemorrhages most commonly extend into the ventricular system

CLEAR III Trial (2017)

  • Design: Low-dose intraventricular alteplase (1 mg q8h, max 12 doses) via EVD vs. saline in patients with IVH and obstructive hydrocephalus
  • Primary outcome: mRS 0–3 at 180 days — NOT significantly different (48% vs. 45%, p=0.48)
  • Key secondary finding: Alteplase significantly reduced mortality (18% vs. 29%, p=0.006) without increasing serious adverse events
  • Interpretation: Alteplase improved clot lysis and reduced mortality, but survivors had more severe disability → net functional outcome was neutral
  • Greater clot removal (>80% of IVH removed) was associated with better functional outcomes
  • Safe — no increase in symptomatic bleeding or ventriculitis

EVD Management Principles

  • Place at Kocher’s point (1 cm anterior to coronal suture, mid-pupillary line, ~11 cm from entry to target)
  • Set drainage height at 10–20 cmH2O above the external auditory meatus
  • Monitor ICP continuously; target ICP <20 mmHg, CPP >60 mmHg
  • Weaning: Gradually raise the EVD (by 5 cmH2O increments) and clamp trial for 24–48 hours before removal; repeat CT to assess ventricle size
  • If patient cannot be weaned from EVD → consider VP shunt (needed in ~20% of IVH patients)
  • Ventriculitis risk: ~5–10%; prophylactic antibiotics are controversial; daily CSF sampling for cell count, glucose, culture
🧪 CLEAR III Take-Home
  • Intraventricular alteplase reduces mortality but does NOT improve functional independence
  • The benefit is a “mortality reduction that shifts survivors toward more severe disability”
  • Shared decision-making with families is essential: trading mortality reduction for potential survival with significant disability
  • Greater clot clearance (>80%) was associated with better outcomes — dosing and timing matter
Prognosis & Recovery

Mortality & Functional Outcomes

  • 30-day mortality: ~40% (highest among all stroke subtypes)
  • 1-year mortality: ~50–60%
  • Only ~12–20% achieve functional independence (mRS 0–2) at 6 months
  • Most recovery occurs in the first 3–6 months; slow continued improvement possible up to 12 months
  • Predictors of worse outcome: Larger hematoma volume, lower GCS, IVH, infratentorial location, older age, hematoma expansion, anticoagulant-related ICH
  • Predictors of better outcome: Younger age, smaller volume, lobar location (if not CAA), preserved consciousness, absence of IVH

Restarting Anticoagulation After ICH

  • Deeply contested and highly tested topic
  • For patients with atrial fibrillation:
    • Risk of recurrent ICH (especially in CAA) must be balanced against risk of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism
    • Lobar ICH (likely CAA) = higher recurrent ICH risk (~7–14%/year) → more caution about restarting
    • Deep ICH (hypertensive) = lower recurrent ICH risk (~2–4%/year) → restarting anticoagulation may be more favorable
  • SoSTART trial (2021): Observational data suggested starting OAC after ICH may reduce all-cause stroke without significantly increasing recurrent ICH risk
  • Timing: If decision is to restart, generally 4–8 weeks after ICH (AHA/ASA); earlier for mechanical heart valves (higher embolic risk)
  • DOACs preferred over warfarin if restarting (lower ICH risk: ~0.3–0.5%/year vs. ~0.5–1%/year)
  • Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO / Watchman device): Alternative to long-term anticoagulation in AF patients with prior ICH; avoids ongoing bleeding risk
  • Decision requires shared decision-making considering CHA2DS2-VASc score, ICH location, CAA status, functional status, patient preferences

Secondary Prevention After ICH

  • Blood pressure control: Most important modifiable factor; target <130/80 mmHg (SPS3, PROGRESS trials support intensive BP control to reduce recurrent stroke)
  • Statin use after ICH:
    • SPARCL trial raised concern about increased ICH risk with high-dose atorvastatin, particularly in patients with prior ICH
    • AHA: Statins can be continued in patients with strong indications (coronary artery disease), but may consider avoiding in lobar ICH / probable CAA
  • Antiplatelet agents: RESTART trial (2019) showed restarting antiplatelets after ICH was NOT associated with increased recurrent ICH; may be reasonable when indicated
  • Lifestyle: Smoking cessation, limit alcohol, regular exercise, healthy diet
💎 Board Pearl

Restarting anticoagulation after ICH: Deep ICH (hypertensive) + high CHA2DS2-VASc = more favorable risk-benefit for restarting. Lobar ICH (probable CAA) = higher recurrent ICH risk, consider LAAO device instead. If restarting, DOACs preferred over warfarin; wait at least 4–8 weeks. RESTART trial supports restarting antiplatelets. SPARCL raised caution about statins in lobar/CAA-related ICH.

Summary: ICH Management Algorithm
  • Step 1: ABCs, airway protection if GCS ≤8, stat NCCT head
  • Step 2: Confirm ICH on CT; obtain CTA (spot sign, vascular malformation); stat labs including coagulation studies
  • Step 3: Reverse anticoagulation immediately (4F-PCC for warfarin, idarucizumab for dabigatran, andexanet alfa or 4F-PCC for Xa inhibitors)
  • Step 4: Lower SBP to <140 mmHg (nicardipine infusion preferred); avoid below 130 mmHg
  • Step 5: ICU admission, continuous monitoring, ICP management if indicated (EVD for hydrocephalus)
  • Step 6: Cerebellar ICH >3 cm or brainstem compression → urgent surgical evacuation
  • Step 7: Treat clinical seizures (levetiracetam preferred); do NOT give prophylactic AEDs
  • Step 8: DVT prophylaxis with IPC devices; start pharmacologic prophylaxis at 24–48 hours
  • Step 9: Repeat imaging at 6–24 hours to assess for expansion
  • Step 10: Goals-of-care discussion — defer major decisions for at least 24–48 hours; avoid self-fulfilling prophecy
  • Step 11: MRI with GRE/SWI when stable to assess for microbleeds (CAA vs. hypertensive SVD), underlying lesion
  • Step 12: Secondary prevention: BP <130/80, reassess anticoagulation/antiplatelet needs, statin risk-benefit, rehabilitation

References

  1. Greenberg SM, Ziai WC, Cordonnier C, et al. 2022 Guideline for the Management of Patients With Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2022;53(7):e282-e361.
  2. Anderson CS, Heeley E, Huang Y, et al. Rapid blood-pressure lowering in patients with acute intracerebral haemorrhage (INTERACT2). Lancet. 2013;382(9890):397-408.
  3. Qureshi AI, Palesch YY, Barsan WG, et al. Intensive blood-pressure lowering in patients with acute cerebral hemorrhage (ATACH-2). N Engl J Med. 2016;375(11):1033-1043.
  4. Mendelow AD, Gregson BA, Rowan EN, et al. Early surgery versus initial conservative treatment in patients with spontaneous supratentorial lobar intracerebral haematomas (STICH II). Lancet. 2013;382(9890):397-408.
  5. Hanley DF, Thompson RE, Rosenblum M, et al. Efficacy and safety of minimally invasive surgery with thrombolysis in intracerebral haemorrhage evacuation (MISTIE III). Lancet. 2019;393(10175):1021-1032.
  6. Hanley DF, Lane K, McBee N, et al. Thrombolytic removal of intraventricular haemorrhage in treatment of severe stroke: results of the randomised, multicentre, multiregion, placebo-controlled CLEAR III trial. Lancet. 2017;389(10069):603-611.
  7. Greenberg SM, Charidimou A. Diagnosis of cerebral amyloid angiopathy: evolution of the Boston criteria. Stroke. 2018;49(2):491-497.
  8. Hemphill JC 3rd, Bonovich DC, Besmertis L, et al. The ICH score: a simple, reliable grading scale for intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2001;32(4):891-897.