Basic Science Physiology

NCS/EMG Basics

NCS/EMG Basics

What Do You Need to Know?

  • Motor NCS (CMAP) — stimulate nerve, record muscle; amplitude reflects motor axon number
  • Sensory NCS (SNAP) — stimulate nerve, record nerve; normal SNAP in radiculopathy (preganglionic)
  • Demyelinating vs axonal — slow CV/conduction block vs low amplitude/fibrillations
  • Late responses — F-wave (proximal motor nerve) vs H-reflex (S1 reflex arc)
  • RNS — decrement in MG, increment in LEMS; know the comparison table
  • Spontaneous activity — fibrillations (denervation, 2–3 weeks), myotonic discharges (dive bomber), myokymia (radiation)
  • MUP analysis — neuropathic = large, long, reduced recruitment; myopathic = small, short, early recruitment
  • Disease patterns — ALS (widespread denervation + normal sensory), GBS (demyelinating + absent F-waves), carpal tunnel (prolonged median DL)
NCS Basics

Motor vs Sensory NCS

FeatureMotor NCS (CMAP)Sensory NCS (SNAP)
StimulateNerveNerve
RecordMuscle (surface electrode)Nerve (ring or bar electrode)
WaveformCMAP (compound muscle action potential)SNAP (sensory nerve action potential)
Amplitude reflectsNumber of motor axons + muscle fibersNumber of sensory axons
Normal amplitude>4–5 mV (nerve-dependent)>10–20 µV (nerve-dependent)
Parameters measuredDistal latency, amplitude, CV, F-waveLatency, amplitude, CV
Key clinical useMotor axon loss, NMJ disorders, myopathyPre- vs postganglionic localization

Orthodromic vs Antidromic Recording

  • Orthodromic — stimulate distally, record proximally (direction of physiologic conduction)
  • Antidromic — stimulate proximally, record distally (against physiologic direction)
  • Antidromic SNAPs are larger (easier to obtain) but may have volume-conducted CMAP contamination
  • Both yield equivalent latency and conduction velocity values
Board Pearl

SNAP is preserved in radiculopathy because the lesion is preganglionic (dorsal root ganglion is intact). SNAP is reduced in plexopathy and peripheral neuropathy (postganglionic lesions). This is the single most important NCS localization principle.

Key NCS Parameters
ParameterWhat It MeasuresAbnormal In
AmplitudeNumber of functioning axons (axon count/integrity)Axonal loss, conduction block (distal to block)
Conduction velocity (CV)Speed of fastest fibers (myelin integrity)Demyelination (<70% lower limit of normal)
Distal latency (DL)Conduction time across distal nerve segmentDistal demyelination (>130% upper limit of normal)
Temporal dispersionSynchrony of conduction across fibers (differential slowing)Acquired demyelination (>30% duration increase proximal vs distal)
Conduction blockFocal inability to conduct across a segmentFocal demyelination (>50% amplitude drop proximal vs distal)
Clinical Pearl

Conduction block produces weakness without atrophy because the axons remain intact — they simply cannot conduct past the demyelinated segment. This explains why patients with GBS or MMN can have severe weakness but preserved muscle bulk early on.

Demyelinating vs Axonal Patterns
FeatureDemyelinatingAxonal
Conduction velocity<70% LLN (markedly slow)Normal or mildly slow (>70% LLN)
Distal latency>130% ULN (prolonged)Normal or mildly prolonged
AmplitudePreserved early; low late (secondary axonal loss)Low (proportional to axon loss)
Temporal dispersionPresentAbsent
Conduction blockPresent (>50% amp drop)Absent
F-wave latencyProlonged or absentNormal or mildly prolonged
Fibrillations on EMGLess prominent (unless secondary axonal loss)Prominent

Clinical Examples

DemyelinatingAxonal
GBS (AIDP)GBS (AMAN, AMSAN)
CIDPDiabetic polyneuropathy
CMT1 (hereditary)CMT2 (hereditary)
MMN (multifocal motor neuropathy)Toxic/metabolic neuropathies
Anti-MAG neuropathyVasculitic neuropathy
Board Pearl

Temporal dispersion and conduction block indicate acquired (non-uniform) demyelination. Hereditary demyelinating neuropathies (e.g., CMT1) show uniformly slow CV without conduction block or temporal dispersion. This distinction separates acquired from inherited causes.

Board Pearl

Severe axonal loss can mimic demyelination — if very few axons remain, the fastest fibers are lost and CV appears slow. Always check whether low amplitude accounts for the slow velocity before diagnosing demyelination.

Late Responses

F-Wave vs H-Reflex

FeatureF-WaveH-Reflex
PathwayAntidromic motor → anterior horn cell → orthodromic returnIa afferent → spinal cord → motor neuron (monosynaptic reflex arc)
Equivalent toNo clinical reflex equivalentElectrical equivalent of the ankle jerk (S1)
LatencyVariable (different anterior horn cells each time)Consistent (same reflex arc)
MorphologyVariable shape and amplitudeConsistent shape
Stimulus intensitySupramaximalSubmaximal (disappears with supramaximal stim)
Nerve testedAny motor nerve (median, ulnar, peroneal, tibial)Tibial nerve (S1 arc); less commonly FCR (C6–C7)
TestsProximal nerve segments, roots, anterior horn cellsS1 root, Ia afferent, motor neuron
Abnormal inGBS (early finding), radiculopathy, proximal neuropathyS1 radiculopathy, polyneuropathy, elderly (absent bilaterally)
Board Pearl

F-waves are often the earliest abnormality in GBS — prolonged or absent when distal NCS are still normal (because demyelination begins at roots/proximal nerve). H-reflex = S1; absent unilateral H-reflex with a normal ankle jerk suggests early or mild S1 radiculopathy.

Repetitive Nerve Stimulation (RNS)

Physiology

  • Low-rate RNS (2–3 Hz) — depletes readily releasable ACh vesicles at NMJ
  • Normal NMJ has a large safety factor → no decrement
  • In MG (postsynaptic defect) → reduced safety factor → decrement >10% at 4th–5th response
  • Post-exercise facilitation — brief exercise increases ACh release → temporary repair of decrement (in MG) or marked increment (in LEMS)
  • High-rate RNS (20–50 Hz) or post-exercise → massive Ca2+ influx at presynaptic terminal → increment in presynaptic disorders

Lambert-Eaton vs MG vs Botulism

FeatureMyasthenia GravisLambert-Eaton (LEMS)Botulism
DefectPostsynaptic (AChR antibodies)Presynaptic (VGCC antibodies)Presynaptic (toxin blocks ACh release)
Baseline CMAPNormalLowLow
Low-rate RNS (2–3 Hz)Decrement >10%May show decrementMay show decrement
Post-exercise / high-rateRepair of decrementIncrement >100%Increment 20–40% (small)
SFEMG jitterIncreased (most sensitive test)IncreasedIncreased
Most sensitive testSFEMG (~95–99%)Post-exercise CMAP incrementEMG + RNS
Board Pearl

LEMS = low baseline CMAP + >100% increment post-exercise. MG = normal baseline CMAP + >10% decrement at low-rate RNS. Botulism shows a low baseline CMAP with only a small increment (20–40%). The magnitude of the increment separates LEMS from botulism.

Clinical Pearl

Always stop acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (e.g., pyridostigmine) at least 12 hours before RNS testing in suspected MG — the drug can mask the decrement and produce a false-negative result.

Needle EMG — Spontaneous Activity
FindingDescriptionSoundAssociated Conditions
Insertional activity (increased)Prolonged bursts with needle movementBrief runs of spikesDenervation, inflammatory myopathy (decreased in fibrosis/fatty replacement)
Fibrillation potentialsSpontaneous single-fiber discharge; biphasic/triphasic; regular firing"Rain on a tin roof"Denervation (onset 2–3 weeks), inflammatory myopathy, muscular dystrophy, NMJ disorders
Positive sharp waves (PSWs)Initial positive deflection then slow negative; regularDull "thud"Same significance as fibrillations
Fasciculation potentialsSpontaneous motor unit discharge; irregular firing rate"Popcorn"ALS, radiculopathy, benign fasciculations, cramp-fasciculation syndrome
Myotonic dischargesWaxing AND waning frequency and amplitude; triggered by needle movement"Dive bomber"DM1/DM2, myotonia congenita, paramyotonia congenita, hyperkalemic periodic paralysis
Complex repetitive discharges (CRDs)Polyphasic; regular; abrupt start/stop; NO waxing/waning"Jackhammer" / "motorcycle"Chronic denervation, chronic myopathy, radiculopathy
Myokymic dischargesGrouped, repetitive bursts of the same MUP; semi-rhythmic"Marching soldiers"Radiation plexopathy, GBS, MS, facial myokymia (brainstem glioma)
Neuromyotonic dischargesVery high frequency (150–300 Hz); decrementing"Ping" / musicalIsaacs syndrome (anti-CASPR2), thymoma, post-radiation
Board Pearl

Myotonic discharge = waxing/waning (dive bomber). CRD = NO waxing/waning (jackhammer). Both are triggered by needle movement, but only myotonic discharges change in frequency and amplitude. Myokymia on EMG → think radiation injury or GBS. Neuromyotonia → Isaacs syndrome.

Motor Unit Potentials (MUPs)

Normal MUP Parameters

  • Amplitude — 200 µV to 5 mV (muscle-dependent)
  • Duration — 5–15 ms (increases with age)
  • Phases — 2–4 phases (>4 = polyphasic; up to 10–15% polyphasic MUPs is normal)

Neuropathic vs Myopathic MUPs

FeatureNeuropathic (Chronic Reinnervation)Myopathic
AmplitudeLarge / giantSmall / low
DurationLongShort
PhasesPolyphasic (due to collateral sprouting)Polyphasic (due to fiber dropout/desynchrony)
RecruitmentReduced (fewer MUPs firing fast)Early / rapid (many small MUPs at low force)
MechanismCollateral sprouting → more fibers per motor unitLoss of muscle fibers → fewer fibers per motor unit
StabilityMay be unstable early (nascent), stable lateMay be unstable (if active disease)

Memory Aid

  • Neuropathic = "LARP" — Large Amplitude, Reduced Recruitment, Polyphasic
  • Myopathic = "SERF" — Small, Early recruitment, Rapid firing, Fractionated (polyphasic)
  • "Sick nerve = big units; sick muscle = small units"
Clinical Pearl

Inclusion body myositis (IBM) is the classic exception — it shows mixed myopathic AND neurogenic MUPs (long-duration polyphasic units in a myopathy). This mixed pattern on EMG is highly characteristic and should prompt consideration of IBM in the right clinical context.

Recruitment

Recruitment Patterns

PatternDescriptionSeen In
NormalRecruitment ratio ~5:1 (firing rate of first MUP when second is recruited)Normal muscle
Reduced (neurogenic)Fewer MUPs firing at high rates (>15–20 Hz before next MUP recruited); incomplete interference patternNeuropathy, radiculopathy, ALS, motor neuron disease
Early / rapid (myopathic)Many small MUPs recruited at low force levels; full interference pattern with minimal effortMyopathy (any cause)
Poor activation (central)Few MUPs firing at low rates; normal MUP morphology; patient cannot increase firing rateUMN lesion, pain, poor effort
Board Pearl

Poor activation (UMN or effort-related) can mimic neurogenic recruitment. The key distinction: in neurogenic reduced recruitment, MUPs fire fast (>15–20 Hz) before the next is recruited. In poor activation, MUPs fire slowly and the patient cannot drive them faster.

Disease Pattern Recognition

Master Table

DiseaseNCS FindingsEMG FindingsKey Distinguishing Feature
ALS Normal sensory NCS; CMAP may be low Widespread fibs + fascs; large MUPs; reduced recruitment in ≥3 regions Widespread denervation + normal sensory = motor neuron disease
GBS (AIDP) Demyelinating: slow CV, prolonged DL, conduction block, temporal dispersion Fibs if secondary axonal loss; reduced recruitment Absent/prolonged F-waves early (often first abnormality)
CIDP Demyelinating (symmetric): prolonged DL >130% ULN, slow CV, conduction block Chronic neurogenic changes if axonal loss Symmetric, chronic, uniform demyelination; responds to treatment
Carpal tunnel syndrome Prolonged median DL; low median SNAP; slow median sensory CV across wrist; normal ulnar Fibs in APB (severe); neurogenic MUPs in APB Median vs ulnar comparison studies (most sensitive)
Radiculopathy Normal NCS (including normal SNAP) Fibs in myotomal distribution; paraspinal fibs; neurogenic MUPs Normal SNAP + abnormal paraspinals = preganglionic lesion
Myopathy (non-inflammatory) Normal NCS (CMAP may be low if severe) Small, short, polyphasic MUPs; early recruitment; no fibs No spontaneous activity (vs inflammatory which has fibs)
Inflammatory / necrotizing myopathy Normal NCS Myopathic MUPs + fibs/PSWs ("irritable myopathy"); CRDs Fibrillations in a myopathic pattern = active muscle fiber necrosis
NMJ disorder (MG) Normal routine NCS; decrement on low-rate RNS Normal routine EMG; increased jitter on SFEMG Decrement >10% at 4th–5th response on RNS
NMJ disorder (LEMS) Low baseline CMAP; >100% increment post-exercise Normal or mildly abnormal routine EMG Low CMAP + dramatic facilitation = presynaptic defect
Board Pearl

ALS requires normal sensory NCS. If sensory studies are abnormal, reconsider the diagnosis. MMN mimics ALS but shows motor conduction block with normal sensory — and is treatable with IVIG. Radiation plexopathy is distinguished from neoplastic plexopathy by the presence of myokymic discharges.

Denervation Timeline

EMG Changes After Nerve Injury

Time After InjuryNCS FindingsEMG Findings
0–7 daysConduction block at lesion; distal responses still normalReduced recruitment only; NO fibrillations
7–10 daysDistal CMAP/SNAP begin to drop (Wallerian degeneration)Reduced recruitment; fibs starting in proximal muscles
2–3 weeksLow or absent distal responsesFibs/PSWs prominent in proximal muscles; paraspinals ~10 days
4–6 weeksLow or absent distal responsesFibs/PSWs reach distal muscles; maximal denervation findings
3–6 monthsMay see nascent CMAPs returningNascent (reinnervation) MUPs: small, polyphasic, unstable; fibs persist
6–12 monthsCMAP improvingLarge polyphasic MUPs (collateral sprouting); reduced recruitment; fibs decreasing
Years (chronic stable)May normalize or remain lowGiant MUPs; reduced recruitment; NO fibs (stable reinnervation)

Interpreting the Timeline

  • Fibs WITHOUT large MUPs → acute/ongoing denervation
  • Fibs WITH large MUPs → chronic process with ongoing denervation
  • Large MUPs WITHOUT fibs → chronic, stable (old injury, fully reinnervated)
  • Fibs appear proximal to distal — paraspinals first (~10 days), proximal limb (2–3 weeks), distal limb (4–6 weeks)
Board Pearl

EMG performed too early (<2–3 weeks) after nerve injury will miss fibrillations. The optimal timing for initial EMG is 3–4 weeks after injury. If fibrillations are present in the first week, suspect a pre-existing or chronic process rather than the acute injury.

Quick Reference

Summary — NCS/EMG at a Glance

QuestionAnswer
Axonal vs demyelinating?Axonal = low amplitude. Demyelinating = slow CV, prolonged DL, conduction block.
Preganglionic vs postganglionic?Normal SNAP = preganglionic (radiculopathy). Abnormal SNAP = postganglionic.
Radiculopathy vs plexopathy?Radiculopathy: normal SNAP + abnormal paraspinals. Plexopathy: abnormal SNAP + normal paraspinals.
Neuropathic vs myopathic MUPs?Neuropathic: large, long, reduced recruitment. Myopathic: small, short, early recruitment.
MG vs LEMS on RNS?MG: normal CMAP + decrement. LEMS: low CMAP + >100% increment.
When do fibs appear?2–3 weeks after injury (proximal muscles first).
Dive bomber sound?Myotonic discharge (waxing/waning).
Myokymia on EMG?Radiation plexopathy, GBS, MS.
Most sensitive test for MG?Single-fiber EMG (SFEMG) — ~95–99% sensitivity.
Earliest finding in GBS?Absent or prolonged F-waves.

Spontaneous Activity Sound Guide

SoundFindingThink Of
"Dive bomber" (waxing/waning)Myotonic dischargeDM1/DM2, myotonia congenita
"Marching soldiers" (grouped bursts)MyokymiaRadiation injury, GBS
"Ping" (high-frequency, decrementing)NeuromyotoniaIsaacs syndrome
"Jackhammer" (abrupt start/stop, no wax/wane)CRDChronic denervation/myopathy
"Rain on tin roof"FibrillationsDenervation, inflammatory myopathy
"Popcorn" (irregular)FasciculationsALS, benign fasciculations
Board Pearl

IBM shows mixed myopathic AND neurogenic MUP features — this is unique among myopathies and a favorite board question. Long-duration polyphasic MUPs in a patient with finger flexor and quadriceps weakness should raise suspicion for IBM.

References

  • Preston DC, Shapiro BE. Electromyography and Neuromuscular Disorders: Clinical-Electrophysiologic-Ultrasound Correlations. 4th ed. Elsevier; 2021.
  • Dumitru D, Amato AA, Zwarts MJ. Electrodiagnostic Medicine. 2nd ed. Hanley & Belfus; 2002.
  • American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM). Practice guidelines for electrodiagnostic medicine.
  • Katirji B. Electromyography in Clinical Practice. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press; 2018.
  • Continuum (AAN). Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine review articles.